Language and Social Interaction

Brendan Lawson, Saul Albert, Magnus Hamann, Laura Jenkins, Tilly Flint, Nathan Ritchie

This project examines interactions between politicians and journalists that centre on statistics--for example, how the pledge of "50,000 more nurses" in the NHS by the UK government functioned within conversations between journalists and different Conservative politicians. They've had three data sessions so far and will be looking to expand their work in 2024.

Jennie Hancox, Saul Albert, Jessica Robles

This project analyses how errors are corrected in an advanced ballet class. Specifically it looks at how the instructor incorporates error correction into different phases of the class to manage the constraints of bodily movement, musical and rhythmic integration, and individual versus group feedback. 

Taeyoung Kim, Saul Albert, Magnus Hamann, Marco Pino, Nathan Ritchie

This project investigates the live coverage of the national mourning surrounding the Queen’s funeral and Lying in State broadcast by the BBC and examines how the broadcaster constructs a narrative of communal experience during live broadcasts. Specifically, we draw on Daniel Dayan and Elihu Katz’s (1992) theory of media events to show how the public broadcaster uses the ‘vox-pop’ format of ostensibly spontaneous, live interviews with ‘the ordinary person on the street’ (Lewis et al. 2005) as part of this process. By analysing the Queen’s funeral and lying in state as media events, we focus on how journalists and members of the public formulate their involvement dialogically. This approach allows us to access and analyse the reproduction of ideology in action (Fine and Kent 1993), as well as moments of discontinuity, resistance, and counter-narratives that emerge through the discursive politics surrounding the nation’s monarch.

Dominic Willmott, Emma Richardson, Laura Jenkins

This project seeks to understand how and when jurors invoke false and prejudicial beliefs when deliberating in a live rape trial recreation. Our data are 435 hours of audio-recorded deliberations across six separate deliberating jury groups. This applied conversation analysis permits us to move beyond evidencing the mere presence of rape myths in the deliberations, as others have done, and instead to look, in detail, at how these are constructed.