SENATE |
|
Minutes of the 362nd (Ordinary) Meeting of Senate
held on Wednesday 26 November 2003.
|
Professor D J Wallace |
|
||||
|
Dr B S Acar Professor D J
Allen Dr J V Beaverstock Dr M C Best Professor S J H Biddle Professor W R Bowman Dr E D Brown Dr S E Dann (ab) Professor I C Davidson Mr M Gallagher (ab) Professor N A Halliwell Dr R A Haslam Dr A Jashapara Professor R Kalawsky Dr R Kinna (ab) |
Professor M W Lansdale Dr C M Linton Ms A J Maclaurin Dr G Mason Ms D C McDonagh (ab) Mr M A Minichiello Dr P Render Dr S J Rothberg Professor P Warwick Miss J Wassall (ab) Professor T G Weyman-Jones Dr G D Wilcox Professor N Wood Professor B Woodward |
|
|||
|
By Invitation: In attendance: |
Professor R H Thring Dr J E Davies (for Minute
03/129) Dr J E M Elliott |
|
|||
Apologies for Absence were
received from Dr Kinna, Ms McDonagh, Professor Thorpe and Professor Wakeman
03/121 Business of the Agenda
Item 12 had been unstarred.
03/122 Minutes
It was RESOLVED to confirm the
Minutes of the 360th meeting held on 25 June 2003 (SEN03-M5),
subject to the following amendments:
MSc Water and Environmental Health
to read MSc Water and Environmental Management
MSc Environmental Dynamics to
read MSc Environmental Dynamics: Monitoring, Evaluation and Management.
03/123 Matters Arising from the Minutes
Minute 03/67.1 – Holywell
Park
The Deputy Vice-Chancellor
reported that all space at Holywell Park was being pursued without need for
marketing and all moves to the site were on track. Plans were underway to fill the space vacated elsewhere on campus
as a result of moves.
03/124 Matters
for Report by the Vice-Chancellor
(i) Sunday Times League Table
The Vice-Chancellor reported that
the University’s move from 27th to 13th place in the
Sunday Times League Table was most pleasing.
The University’s position regarding Student:Staff Ratios was puzzling
however, with the University appearing out of line with its competitors. The Planning Office had undertaken
investigations suggesting that the two permitted ways of returning aggregate
staff data to HEFCE might be the root cause, one of those methods
disadvantaging SSRs. Investigations
were continuing and would be reported to Senate’s next meeting. Members were reminded that data within
newspapers league tables were not peer reviewed.
ACTION: RAF
(ii) Letter
to HEFCE’s Chief Executive
SEN03-P71
Senate received a letter sent by
the Vice-Chancellor to HEFCE’s Chief Executive, who had responded positively.
(iii) Patterns for Higher Education in the
UK: Third Report
The Deputy Vice-Chancellor
outlined the University’s position in the Report, showing us comfortably placed
in comparison with the 1994 Group which included Bath, UMIST, Surrey, Warwick
and York. The Report was based on
2000/01 data, so the University’s position in regard to international students,
for example, might well have changed.
The next stage would involve analysis of later data on a subject basis.
(iv)
The Vice-Chancellor reported on HM The Queen’s recent visit
to open the National Cricket Academy, and the visit by the Head of the MIT side
of the Cambridge MIT Institute, who had been impressed by the University’s
business links. HRH Prince Philip had
agreed to open the Sir Denis Rooke Building in March 2004 which would be an
excellent launch for Holywell Park.
(v)
The
Vice-Chancellor reported that the Loughborough Innovation Centre had been
awarded the UK Business Incubation Ltd’s Best Newcomer Award. Such an award was important to the
University in progressing its internationalisation.
03/125 Matters
for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research)
(i) New Research Grants and Contracts
An updated version of SEN03-P73
had been circulated to members showing research grant and contract income for
the first quarter of 2003/04 at £6.9m.
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) congratulated departments on this
achievement, which put the University on track to increase its annual research
grant and contract income.
(ii) Research Grants and Contracts
applications
An updated version SEN03-P74 had
been circulated to members showing 186 applications totalling £20.1M for the
first quarter of 2003/04. The
Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) congratulated the Department of Chemistry on
having submitted 30 applications totalling £1.9M in that period. EU Contracts worth £5.8m were under
negotiation. The Pro-Vice-Chancellor
(Research) informed Senate that the University’s success rates from research
grant and contract applications from the EU and EPSRC were above the sector
average.
A tabled paper of the University’s
RGC income targets up to 2006/07 for Sociology (UoA 42) showed this to be ahead
of the average for 5* rated departments.
Such targets were being produced for all departments to serve as a
benchmark for research funding to be sought based on a success rate for
applications of 3 : 1. A member
commented that success rates of applications varied and EPSRC would prefer less
applications and the resulting ability to fund more. The Vice-Chancellor emphasised the need for HoDs to provide
support to staff to achieve a higher success rate with RGC applications. Senate was reminded that the research income
metric was but one component of research excellence and was insignificant
compared to the quality of research output.
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research)
referred to a letter to Vice-Chancellors from the Minister of Science and
Innovation and the Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher
Education on Higher Education Research which had been circulated to members. The letter had been a disappointment,
reinforcing as it did the dual-support system of research funding. The Vice-Chancellor informed Senate that he
would continue to press for a thorough review of HE research funding. It was noted from the letter that reforms to
ensure that institutions recovered the full economic cost of research had now
been deferred to September 2005.
(iii) Responses to Consultation Exercises
Senate received a Statement by the
UK HE Funding bodies on the Review of Research Assessment. The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research)
highlighted that there had been support for producing ratings expressed as
quality profiles. It was not the
intention to grade individuals but their work and he re-emphasised the
importance of staff publishing their work in internationally leading
outlets. Preferably all staff would be
submitted in the next RAE, but sufficient output would be vital. An audit of research output was being
conducted by the Research Office and help would be provided to departments as
necessary.
03/126 Matters
for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)
(i) Student Recruitment
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)
reported on the successful outcome of the 2002/03 recruitment process. Congratulations were extended to Admissions
Tutors for their efforts in this regard.
It was commented that data on LUSAD’s Foundation Year recruitment had not
been included in the figures and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching) undertook
to ensure that such data would be included in future analyses.
ACTION: PVC(T)
(ii) Institutional Audit
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)
reported that since Senate’s last meeting the QAA Assistant Director
responsible for the University’s Audit had visited to discuss the overall
planning and timetable for the visit on 22-26 March 2004. The University’s Self Evaluation Document
had been submitted to QAA by the deadline and Mr Bowyer, Senior Assistant
Registrar, was to be congratulated on producing the document. The five departments to undergo Discipline
Audit Trails would be known by 15 December.
An Audit intranet site had been set up, which included the Self
Evaluation Document and other information, including the paperwork that
departments should review in preparation for the audit (https://internal.lboro.ac.uk/admin/registry/uniwide/audit/index.htm). It was suggested that HoDs would find useful
a list of QAA trained reviewers within the University.
ACTION: PVC (T)
(iii) Committee to Review the Structure of the
Academic Year
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)
reported that proposals from the Working Group were now out for
consultation. The Group was due to
submit its final report to Senate in June 2004.
(iv) HEFCE’s Consultation on the Teaching
Funding Model
The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)
reported that the University’s response to the consultation on the modification
of price bands had been submitted to HEFCE.
Departments’ comments had been taken into account and the response would
be made available on the intranet.
There was uncertainty as to when the changes would take effect. To enable appropriate planning, HoDs
requested guidance on whether/how internal funding allocations might be
affected.
ACTION: DVC
(Secretary’s Note: The document entitled Final HEFCE T Fund 12
Nov 03 is available at: https://internal.lboro.ac.uk/admin/registry/uniwide/)
03/127 Higher
Tuition Fees for UK and EU Full-time Undergraduates
Senate received a paper from the
Bursar and noted the establishment of a small working party to assess the
implications of government proposals and prepare plans and recommend structures
to enable decisions to be made by the relevant bodies in the University,
contingent upon the legislation being passed.
03/128 Motion
for Senate: Pay Structures
Senate considered the following
motion proposed by Professor Bowman and seconded by Dr Berry:
‘Senate views with concern the possible
breakdown of national pay bargaining arrangements for academic and
academic-related staff. Senate notes
that such staff are recruited in national and international markets and
believes that nationally-agreed pay structures are the fairest and also the
most efficient way to enable this University to recruit the staff it
needs. Senate therefore urges the
officers of the University to use all their influence to attempt to maintain
national pay bargaining and thus prevent the time-consuming and wasteful
process of negotiating pay structures at local level.’
Professor Bowman presented the
case, identifying Senate as the appropriate body for its discussion in view of
the implications on academic life and staff recruitment that would result from
negotiating pay structures at local level.
There was some confusion amongst members as to what was meant by
‘negotiating pay structures at local level’, since UCEA was not arguing for
local pay bargaining and some aspects of pay structures were already locally
determined. It was suggested that such
a matter would be more appropriately discussed by the Academic and Related
Staff Negotiating Sub-Committee.
Following comments from members in support of national pay bargaining,
it was AGREED to vote on the following revised motion, which removed reference
to negotiating pay structures at the local level:
‘Senate views with concern the
possible breakdown of national pay bargaining arrangements for academic and
academic-related staff. Senate notes that
such staff are recruited in national and international markets and believes
that nationally-agreed pay structures are the fairest and also the most
efficient way to enable this University to recruit the staff it needs. Senate therefore urges the officers of the
University to use all their influence to attempt to maintain national pay
bargaining.’
The motion was carried by 29 votes
to 1 with 10 abstentions. The
Vice-Chancellor agreed to write to the Head of UCEA with Senate’s resolution.
ACTION: VC
03/129 Annual
Report of Student Discipline Committee
.1 Senate received the Report of
the Student Discipline Committee for 2002/03 and a tabled paper from the Student
Discipline Committee proposing changes to Ordinance XVII. Dr Davies, Chair of the Student Discipline
Committee, presented the papers in the Registrar’s absence. He outlined the increase in violent offences
by students, the difficulties resulting from delayed consideration of cases
outside the University’s control, the need to be fair to victims and the bad
image resulting for the University from the poor behaviour of some students and
the University’s apparent inability to deal with it in some cases. He informed Senate that dealing with major
offences was resource intensive in terms of investigation and
presentation. Co-operation from LSU was
good. The proposed changes to Ordinance
XVII were intended to alleviate some of the difficulties.
.2 Comments on the papers were
invited from members and the following were amongst those received:
·
Interfering with fire equipment was listed as a minor
offence but should be considered a major offence.
·
The Appeals procedure for minor offences should require
evidence from the University Officer imposing the penalty.
·
The data on ethnicity were intended to ensure that the
disciplinary procedure was not discriminatory.
·
The balance of students in Halls, with more first years and
fewer finalists, was likely to be a contributory factor to poorer
behaviour. Short- and medium-term
measures were being taken to improve that balance.
·
The appointment of a Community Warden had proved
beneficial. Hall Wardens had an
important role and should be better supported. A Director of Wardens had recently been appointed and this
should aid dialogue with Wardens.
·
There was a wide range in the number of penalties imposed by
Wardens, probably reflecting the different Hall structures. It was suggested that this observation be
forwarded to the Director of Wardens for further consideration.
·
LSU continued its efforts to educate students on alcohol
abuse, often the cause of students’ violent behaviour.
·
Students were often confused about what was expected from them
when arriving at University. Addressing
both academic and social behaviour at induction might lead towards a better
behavioural culture.
·
Reports from the Student Discipline Committee in future
years should present a statistical analysis showing trends.
.3 Addressing the particular
amendments proposed to Ordinance XVII, concern was expressed that such
important decisions were being expected on a tabled paper, and that the
proposals should be viewed by the University’s solicitor to ensure no legal inconsistencies
or contravention of any legislation.
Senate was informed of LSU’s support
for the proposals, but concern regarding the proposed automatic suspension of a student on receiving a
criminal conviction or caution, which the Union would wish to be further
considered in discussion with the police.
.4 In order to expedite matters so
that the proposals could be received by Council in December, it was AGREED that
members of Senate be asked to consider the proposed revised wording of
Ordinance XVII and forward any comments to Dr Davies by the end of the
week. It was suggested that in order to
avoid delay members of Ordinances & Regulations Committee should consider
the document by correspondence. It was
also AGREED that Dr Davies would ensure the absence of legal inconsistencies in
the draft, taking account of LSU’s concerns.
ACTION: JED/JMT, JEME
03/130 Programme
Proposals
On the recommendation of Learning
and Teaching Committee, on the advice of Curriculum Sub-Committee, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to Council as appropriate:
(i) New Programmes for introduction in the
2003/04 session
Masters level programme in
Chemical Sciences, incorporating:
- MSc
Analytical and Pharmaceutical Science
-
MSc Analytical Chemistry (new title)
-
MSc Pharmaceutical Science and Medicinal Chemistry (new
title)
-
MSc Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Science (new
title)
MSc Mobile Communications
MSc Networked Communications
(ii) New Programme Structure for introduction
in the 2004/05 session:
Undergraduate programme in
Chemical Sciences, incorporating the existing titles:
-
BSc/MChem Chemistry
-
BSc/MChem Chemistry with Analytical Chemistry
-
BSc/MChem Chemistry with Forensic Analysis
-
BSc/MChem Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry
(iii) Major programme changes from the 2003/04
session:
MMath Mathematics – introduction
of DPS Award
Professional Certificate/Diploma
in Retail Automotive Management – change of award and title to LPC/LPD in
Automotive Retail Management
(iv) Discontinuation of the following
programmes:
BEng Mathematical Engineering
(last intake October 2002)
MA Design Studies (no current
students)
03/131 Ordinances and Regulations Committee
Regulations
for Higher Degrees by Research: Regulations for the Degree of Doctor of
Engineering (Eng D)
On the recommendation of Ordinances
and Regulations Committee and Research Committee it was RESOLVED to amend para
19.20 of RHDR to raise the limit on the number of words for the discourse on
research work undertaken, with immediate effect.
03/132 Research Committee
Criteria for the
Appointment of External Examiners for Research Degrees
On the recommendation of Research
Committee, Senate considered revised criteria. The view was expressed, with support, that the proposals
represented an additional and unnecessary bureaucratic burden. Whilst expressing some sympathy for this
view, the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) informed Senate that from 2005/06 the
funding of research students would be dependent upon the University satisfying
threshold standards, in this case that External Examiners should be
demonstrably research active. It was
commented that with guidance provided by AD(R)s the proposed criteria could in
effect reduce bureaucracy, by removing the need to argue cases not meeting
current criteria. It was RESOLVED to
approve the revised criteria subject to the understanding that AD(R)s would
accept a brief note from a HoD in cases where a proposed External Examiner’s
research status could not be in doubt.
03/133 Resources
and Planning Committee
On the recommendation of Resources
& Planning Committee it was RESOLVED to approve revised Terms of Reference
for Information Services Committee.
03/134 Prizes
Committee
.1 Senate noted the action of the
Registrar on behalf of Senate in recommending to Council the establishment of
new prizes.
.2 It was RESOLVED to recommend to Council
the establishment of new prizes, amendments to prizes and the discontinuation
of prizes.
03/135 PVC
Innovation Centre
Senate noted the action of the
Vice-Chancellor on behalf of Senate in recommending to the Chair of Council on
behalf of Council the establishment of the PVC Innovation Centre in IPTME from
November 2003.
03/136 Centre
for Olympic Studies
It was RESOLVED to recommend to
Council the establishment of the Centre for Olympic Studies in the School of
Sport & Exercise Sciences, with effect from 1 January 2004.
03/137 Department of European and International
Studies: Change of Name
Senate
noted the action of the Vice-Chancellor on behalf of Senate in recommending to
the Chair of Council on behalf of Council a change in the name of the
Department of European and International Studies to the Department of Politics,
International Relations and European Studies, with immediate effect.
(Senate’s
approval of this recommendation was sought via the Vice-Chancellor’s email
dated 7 August 2003).
03/138 MSc Risk and Reliability Methods:
Transfer to Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering
Further to Minute 03/79 of
Senate’s 360th meeting on 25 June 2003, Senate noted the action of
the Deputy Vice-Chancellor on behalf of Senate in approving the further transfer
of responsibility for the MSc in Risk and Reliability Methods to the Department
of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, with effect from 1 August 2003.
03/139 Membership of Senate 2003/04
Noted.
03/140 Corporate Planning Statement 2003
Senate
noted the Corporate Planning Statement 2003, approved by Council at its meeting
on 15 July 2003.
03/141 Executive Management Group
Responsibilities and Organisational Chart
Noted.
03/142 Librarian’s Annual Report 2002/03
Senate received the Annual Report
for 2002/03 from the Librarian.
03/143 Graduation Ceremonies: 2004 to 2005
Senate
noted the dates of graduation ceremonies from 2004 to 2005 as follows:
Summer
2004 Thursday 8 July 2004
Friday 9 July 2004
Monday 12 July 2004
Tuesday 13 July
2004
Winter
2004 Monday 20 December 2004
Summer
2005 Thursday 14 July 2005
Friday 15 July 2005
Monday 18 July 2005
Tuesday 19 July
2005
Winter
2005 Monday 19 December 2005
The date of the Winter graduation
ceremony in 2003 was Monday 15 December 2003.
03/144 Reports
from Committees
Senate
received reports from the following committees:
.1 SEN03-P91 Research Committee of 30 October 2003
.2 SEN03-P92 Ordinances and Regulations Committee of 31
October 2003
.3 SEN03-P93 Learning and Teaching Committee of 6
November 2003
.4 SEN03-P94 Resources and Planning Committee of 30
October and
7
November 2003
.5 SEN03-P95 Student Services Committee of 5 November
2003
.6 SEN03-P96 Prizes Committees of 12 November 2003
03/145 Date of Next Meeting
Wednesday 28 January 2004 at 9.15
am (if necessary).
Wednesday 3 March 2004 at 9.15am.
Author – Jennie Elliott
Date –November 2003
Copyright © Loughborough University. All rights reserved.