LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY
A REPORT TO SENATE ON UNDERGRADUATE AND TAUGHT POSTGRADUATE RECRUITMENT
2003 ENTRY
This
report identifies both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the 2002/03
recruitment processes for undergraduate and taught postgraduate students.
Reference is made not only to the outcomes themselves but also to the context
within which they have been achieved. Actions to build on the successes and
also to address the negative aspects, are included.
The
most recent intake statistics for 2003 entry are attached.
1. UNDERGRADUATE RECRUITMENT
Positive Features
UK/EU
Applications and Intakes
International
Applications and Intakes
·
Overall applications increase of 20.2%
· Intake (221) ahead of planning target (197) by 12.2% and actual intake in 2002 (171) by 29.2%
UK
Marketing
UK Widening Participation
Negative Features
UK/EU
Applications and Intakes
Observations on UK/EU Applications
· Sharp decreases in applications in certain subject areas reflecting national trends (eg Chemistry and Computer Science/Information Technology)
· 1998-2003 applications pattern unstable: growth/growth/decline/growth/decline
· 14/21 departments attracted more than 500 applications in 2003
· Ratio of applications to intakes for 13/21 departments at least 4:1 (complete range 2.5:1 to 14.2:1)
· Few new programmes launched in 2003
· Existing portfolio unable to take advantage of 2003 growth areas nationally (eg Medicine, Law)
Actions
2. Taught Postgraduate Recruitment
Positive Features
Negative Features
·
(UK/EU)
inconsistent outcomes across departments: among
those with targets of 5 and above, 4 with overshoots of 10%+ and 7 with
shortfalls of 10%+
·
(International)
conversion from "unconditional offer firmly
accepted" category (UF) to actual arrivals down by 7% compared to 2002
·
(International
– longer term) China (including Hong Kong) too dominant a source of taught
postgraduate students? ( 37.5% in 2001, 56.3% in 2002, 70.7% in 2003)
Observations
Actions
3. Conclusion
The University will be pleased that the overall targets for UK/EU undergraduate and taught postgraduate recruitment have been achieved. There may be concerns, however, that in both categories, the distribution between and within Faculties deviated from the approved numbers in some cases. Compensatory action was taken to ensure that the result at institutional level was not compromised. The SRA Team will continue to work at the appropriate levels to seek to smooth out perturbations in the system.
The results of the HEIST research
into the visibility and image of the University
in the eyes of prospective undergraduate applicants will become known shortly. It is hoped
that this will help guide future marketing priorities
as the institution seeks to enhance its position in an increasingly competitive
environment.
Student Recruitment and Admissions Team
November 2003