|
Local financing mechanisms for water supply in Kenya
This
Country Note identifies the key financing mechanisms
for supporting water services in Kenya.
Compiled
by: Gerald Rukunga, Titus Kioko and Lennah
Kanyangi of AMREF
Edited by: Frank Odhiambo, WEDC
Headline
facts
-
Inadequate financial resources and inappropriate
financing mechanisms are often cited as
constraints to achieving sustained, expanded and
improved water services in Kenya.
-
A little over 1% of Kenya's national public
expenditure is allocated to the water supply and
sanitation sector - an allocation that is
clearly inadequate to finance the
ever-increasing demand for water.
-
Private sector investment has been identified as
one of the key long-term financing schemes.
However, uncertainty of achieving adequate
returns on their investment remains a
significant barrier to securing private sector
investments.
-
As additional sector finance is sought, there is
an emerging consensus that current expenditure
needs to be more efficient and effective in
order to achieve rapid and sustainable progress.
-
Where poverty restricts direct user payment for
basic services, financing mechanisms such as
pro-poor targeted subsidies, micro-financing and
credit facilities are recognized as effective
means of meeting the finance gap. In Kenya
their practical application still needs to be
more widely explored, understood and
disseminated.
Local
Financing Mechanisms in Kenya
-
A
number of channels are used to fund water supply
schemes in Kenya and include:
-
Government of Kenya budget which is the dominant
channel for financing the water sector in Kenya.
-
Local
Authority budgets
-
Non
Governmental Organizations who implement water
projects directly or indirectly through
community based organizations.
-
Internal generation by service providers mainly
local utilities, community based organizations
and private small scale providers. The money
generated is used for repair and maintenance of
the water facilities or expanding the
investments.
-
Other
direct expenditures by communities and
households. This includes money paid to small
scale water vendors and water kiosk operators.
Donor Funding
Almost 70% of donor resources
allocated to the development of new community-based
water schemes are routed through NGOs. The
approaches taken by these NGOs vary – some NGOs
fully fund water schemes while others operate on a
cost-sharing basis with the target communities. Many
however appear to operate in isolation to local
government agencies.
SIDA
support to the transfer of RWS schemes to CBOs in
Kenya
Recently, the
Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) has
begun to fund the transfer of government-implemented
schemes to communities. The community must apply
through a proposal that is vetted by the government
before funds are released The program favours low
technology, such as gravity schemes and small
systems. SIDA requires that the beneficiaries make a
significant contribution towards the capital cost of
the rehabilitation of the system. The level of
contribution has ranged from 10 to 50 percent.
Operation and maintenance of the rehabilitated
scheme then become the responsibility of the
community. Though at present no effort has been made
to link with credit for the community to meet its
share, this is a potential opportunity, particularly
given the improved outreach of microfinance in
Kenya. This will, however, require a clear policy on
community share in capital costs and efforts to link
with Micro Finance Institutions and the co-operative
sector.
Private Small-Scale Service Providers (PSSPs)
PSSPs include service providers in
informal settlements, those catering to special
demands of the rich and commercial establishments.
They may be water resellers, (kiosk operators),
water vendors, water truckers, borehole operators
and small water network operators. The Water and
Sanitation Program – AF found that 1 in 4 of Kenya’s
urban residents depend on small scale service
providers for their water needs. They play a very
important role especially in informal settlements
where the main utility supplies are missing. Most
PSSPs meet their running costs through user charges.
Limited access to credit facilities for capital
investment is one of the main constraints to market
entry and the expansion of services provided by
these small providers.
Community Financing
Kenya’s national water policy
promotes community operation and maintenance of
water supply systems. The role of community-based
organizations has therefore become more significant.
Water committees, selected by the communities, are
often entrusted with this responsibility.
Communities raise maintenance funds by charging for
water at the point of delivery (such as 2 KShs. for
a 20 litre jerrican)1.
In most cases however households pay a fixed monthly
contribution, or help raise money as and when
required, to carry out repairs or expand the scheme.
Some agencies promote using bank accounts to secure
maintenance funds, but the resulting bank charges
often deter communities from doing this
This typically requires committee
members (often voluntary) to be trained in financial
management, book-keeping and maintenance procedures
A case of Mderu water project
Nderu water project is a community project
operating two boreholes, which provide water for
the Community within the project area. The
project dates back to 1926 when a settler sank
one borehole to obtain water for his personal
use. After independence the county council of
Kiambu took over the operation of the borehole
and extended the distribution network. The
council continued with the operation of the
water facility but with great difficulty. In
1990, mainly due to financial difficulties, the
facility broke down and the power supply was
disconnected. In 1992 the Community members
approached the county council of Kiambu and were
allowed to revive and manage the water
project. Kshs 140,000 (US$4,500) was borrowed
from two institutions in the community.
Thairira Technical Institute and Mirithu
Secondary School. The loan proceeds were used to
rehabilitate the borehole and pay outstanding
electricity bills. Normal water operations
resumed later in 1992, and after only six months
of operation the community had collected enough
revenue to pay back the loan after meeting its
operation costs. The project serves about 1,200
families and has been running smoothly
since
Self-Help Financing of Rural Water Supplies
About 30% of Kenya’s rural
population who have access to safe water are served
by community managed schemes, developed by self-help
groups. A self-help group typically constructs a
water supply system to serve around 500 households.
Capital may be raised from the community’s own
resources, or with contributed funds from
government, NGOs or external support agencies.
Self-help groups usually set the
household contribution required to receive an
in-house supply, while providing water to others
through public tap stands. The revenue generated is
used to support operation and maintenance of the
facility.
Constraints of Institutional Financing
Many constraints face existing
financing arrangements, affecting the effectiveness
with which sectoral finances are secured and
delivered in Kenya.
-
Given
their limited collateral, it is difficult for
Community Based Organizations to access credit
services.
-
There
is often inadequate political will and
commitment to create an environment that will
encourage and enhance investment in the water
sector. Local authorities often lack incentives
to improve financial performance, particularly
where there is weak, or non-existent,
performance-based monitoring.
-
The
CBOs have very low capacity on financial
management and accountability.
An environment should therefore be
created to enable these service providers to access
credit facilities.
Emerging
Financial Mechanisms
The water sector reform framework
envisages more streamlined sector financing, with
greater emphasis on achieving sustainable revenue.
One of the financing avenues
outlined in the new Water Act is the Water Services
Trust Fund (WSTF). This fund is financed mainly by
the government and its development partners. It
mobilizes resources to support communities that
cannot afford water service because of extreme
poverty. In the past two years, the Government of
Kenya in partnership with the Swedish and Danish
governments have given the trust fund Kshs. 750
million which has already been disbursed to 102
community water and sanitation projects.
Again under the new reforms, revenue
is going to be generated by Water Service Providers
(WSPs) through tariff payments by the consumers.
This is seen as a significant source of sector
finance that will be increasingly relied on and will
be used for extension and improvement of the water
provision service.
The Kenyan Government has
established a special fund which draws its finances
from the national budget. The money is distributed
equally across all parliamentary constituencies in
the country and finances priority projects as
identified by the respective communities. Water
supply ranks high among priorities in many regions
in Kenya and as such the kitty has been used to fund
many water projects across the country.
Other
Potential Financing Mechanisms
Microfinance for Community-Managed Rural Water
Service Pilot Project in Kenya
A new pilot
project being designed in Kenya aims to facilitate
access to microfinance for community managed rural
piped water supply projects on a commercial basis.
The performance risks are taken by the water project
entity that will be eligible for a partial
Output-Based Aid (OBA) subsidy on delivery of
outputs to refinance a part of the loan and keep the
debt repayment affordable. Water and Sanitation
Program - AF is facilitating the K-Rep Bank and the
Nairobi Water Services Board to develop this pilot
project with assistance from the Global Partnership
on Output-Based Aid (GPOBA).
This innovative financing
arrangement offers two distinct potential benefits
to the rural water sector: it leverages resources,
and contributes to sustainability and effective use
of resources. The approach is also designed for
potential scaling up through a special OBA window at
the national Water Services Trust Fund and a new
business line for the K-Rep Bank, a Kenyan- based
microfinance institution.
Key
References
-
Meera, M. and Kameel, V.
(2003).
Financing Small Water Supply and Sanitation
Service Providers; Exploring the microfinance
option in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Varley,
R.C.G, (1995). Financial Services and
Environmental Health: Household Credit for Water
and Sanitation, EHP Applied Study 2, USAID,
and Washington, USA. Available at
http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/pnabu314.pdf
Government of Uganda. (2005). Poverty
Eradication Action Plan (2004/5-2007/8),
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic
Development, Kampala, Uganda. Available at:
www.finance.go.ug
WSP
(2004). Sector Finance and Resource Flows for
Water Supply, A Pilot Application for Kenya,
Water and Sanitation Program – Africa Region,
Nairobi, Kenya. Executive summary available at
http://www.wsp.org/publications/af_flows_kenya_execsum.pdf
WSP,
(2003). Governance and Financing of water
supply and sanitation in Ethiopia, Kenya and
South Africa: A Cross Country Synthesis,
Water and Sanitation Program – Africa Region,
Nairobi, Kenya. Available at
http://www.wsp.org/publications/af_governance.pdf
Colligan B. and Vezina M. Independent Water
and Sanitation Providers in African Cities
(WSP April 2000)
This Country
Note is based on the WELL Global Briefing Note
series. These and other Country Notes are
available at
http://www.Lboro.ac.uk/well/
For
further information contact:
Gerald Rukunga
African
Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF)
Langata
Road, Wilson Airport,
PO
Box 30125 - 00100
Nairobi
Kenya Email:
rukunga@amrefke.org
Phone: 0(254) 20 6994352
Fax: 0 (254) 20 602531/606340
WELL
Water, Engineering and
Development Centre (WEDC)
Loughborough University
Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK
well@lboro.ac.uk Phone:
+44 (0)1509 228304 Fax:
+44 (0)1509 211079
BACK TO TOP
Home > Resources > Fact sheets > Child survival
|