|
Breaking sectoral barriers for School Sanitation and
Hygiene Education (SSHE)
This
Briefing Note gives an overview of the current
institutional arrangements for undertaking SSHE in
Ghana and in India, identifying challenges faced and
lessons learned for future implementation.
Compiled
by: Julie Fisher of WEDC
Based on the full report by Marielle Snel, Kochurani
Mathew and Vincent Tay
Headline
facts
-
Inter-sectoral partnerships and
inter-departmental collaboration at local,
regional, national and global levels can
advocate for better SSHE.
-
The goal of SSHE cannot be achieved without
adopting a comprehensive approach, combining
skills-based education with supporting policies
and full integration into existing educational
structures.
-
Hygiene education usually takes place as an
extra-curricula activity rather than being
incorporated as a key element of the school
curriculum. Teachers do not always receive
sufficient training on this to make them
effective facilitators.
-
The construction and design of water and
sanitation facilities have to be child-friendly,
and in particular girl-friendly.
-
Areas for monitoring in SSHE programmes cover
physical aspects and financial coverage as well
as tracking process indicators at school level.
Institutional Models in Ghana
In Ghana, SSHE
falls within the national School Health Education
Programme (SHEP). This was instituted in 1992 by a
government directive stipulating that the Ghana
Health and Education Services were to deliver a
comprehensive, community-based programme focusing on
health and education and health services in schools.
The SHEP creates community awareness of children’s
health needs, and mobilizes commitment by the
community and schools, to improving child health and
to facilitating effective learning.
Implementation
of SHEP has raised certain problems, due to weak
collaboration between the Education and Health
Services, and the lack of adequate government
funding which has dramatically slowed down its
development. The Community Water and Sanitation
Agency (CWSA) responsible for small towns and rural
water and sanitation services, has provided support
to SHEP since 1994, working in communities to supply
potable water and constructing household latrines.
Schools were given their own latrines and
handwashing facilities, with appropriate training
about school hygiene activities and the operation
and maintenance of the facility. Active
collaboration was achieved between CWSA and the
Education Service, from regional to district level,
although the Health Service was not included in
this.
Since 2005, new
strategies for supporting the water and sanitation
sector have been implemented by key development
partners. DANIDA supports four of the country’s ten
regions, with SHEP seen as a stand-alone component,
receiving direct support under the umbrella of the
national SHEP office. A SSHE Component Coordinating
Committee has been set up, involving members from
the various stakeholder bodies concerned, to
strengthen inter-sectoral collaboration and
sustainability in these areas. In other regions,
still very little collaboration exists among
decentralized departments to implement SSHE.
Moreover, since SSHE became a component on its own,
the level of collaboration with the CWSA has
declined.
The Ministry of
Local Government and Rural Development is a key
stakeholder in SSHE implementation. The
Environmental Health and Management Department has a
mandate to enforce environmental health standards.
Environmental Health Assistants regularly visit
schools and other premises, checking food hygiene,
cleanliness (including that of water and sanitation
facilities) and undertaking hygiene promotion.
Efforts have been made towards inter-sectoral
collaboration by including national SHEP officials
in planning activities, in order to achieve greater
impact. This does not happen at district level, with
little harmonization of planning by the District
Health Management team, the District Education
Office and the Environmental Health and Management
Department.
All key sector
agencies with a role to play in SSHE implementation
recognize the need for strong intersectoral
collaboration; however, there is the belief that the
Ghana Education Service should take the initiative
to foster this. This results in a lack of consistent
effort within the different government
administrative levels.
Challenges and responses
- SHEP is being
implemented throughout Ghana. However, its
goal of improving the health environment of
school children poses several challenges in
terms of prioritization, implementation,
monitoring, evaluation and sustainability.
This goal cannot be achieved without adopting a
cross-sectoral approach and inter-departmental
collaboration.
Inter-sectoral
collaboration -
Involving all stakeholders such as the Ministry
of Education, the Ghana Education and Health
Services and the Ministry of Health has proved
to be problematic but necessary for achieving
the goals of SHEP. The various activities
undertaken by the hygiene sub-sector are often
ad hoc due to the lack of conformity between
programmes of these agencies.
Collaboration at local
level -
Successful SHEP activities require collaboration
with other decentralized departments such as
those dealing with health and water. However,
this may be restricted by the need for approval
from the central ministries, which can result in
delay and inaction on issues that could promote
SHEP activities.
Financial challenges -
Current SHEP activities are limited by
inadequate levels of core government funding.
The consequences of this are that regional and
district coordinators lack the necessary
logistics to perform well, relying on donor
support.
Monitoring -
There is no
structured monitoring system of SHEP at present.
Quarterly progress reports are generated at
district but not at school level.
Hygiene education -
Hygiene education
is not incorporated into the school curricula;
rather it is an extra-curricula activity.
Teachers are expected to introduce hygiene
education into other areas of learning, although
they are not given appropriate training or
guidance to do this. The CWSA has developed a
manual for teachers in rural schools but this is
not recognized by the Ghana Education Service.
Staff quality -
SHEP personnel
receive no hygiene training. This limits the
capacity of the programme to plan and implement
activities. UNICEF has been an important source
of hygiene training for SHEP staff.
Institutional Models in India
For the past ten
years, the Government of India has been committed to
implementing SSHE in its upper, secondary and early
childhood programmes. The Total Sanitation Campaign
(TSC) was one reform brought about by the
community-based Central Rural Sanitation Programme (CRSP),
which included school sanitation. TSC focuses on
community-led and people-centred initiatives,
emphasizing Information, Education and Communication
(IEC) for demand generation, hygiene education,
human resource development, and capacity building,
along with providing sanitation hardware to
households, schools and nurseries.
Government
partnerships with UNICEF have played a significant
role in the evolution of SSHE in India.
Educational reform through the District Primary
Education Programme focused on water and sanitation
in unserved schools in 15 states and has
subsequently scaled up to become the Sarav Shiksa
Abhiyan. This aims to ensure universal elementary
education by 2010 by planning for decentralized
management and capacity building. SSHE is also
strengthened by the Accelerated Rural Water Supply (ARWSP)
and Department of Drinking Water Supply programmes.
This inter-sectoral involvement requires concerted
efforts to integrate water supply, sanitation,
health and hygiene education.
The Indian approach to SSHE
SSHE in India aims to promote sanitation and hygiene
in schools to achieve lasting behaviour change. It
also seeks to promote the right of the child to a
healthy and safe learning environment, while taking
into account local needs and preferences. These
include both hardware and software components:
-
The child as
an agent of change
(teacher-Child-Family-Community);
-
Hygiene
education using a life-skills approach;
-
Child-friendly (especially girl-child and the
disabled) water and sanitation;
-
Regular
health checks and de-worming;
-
School as
the knowledge centre with the teacher as
facilitator / motivator;
-
Institution
building of school WATSAN / Health Committees;
-
Promotion of
school environmental cleanliness;
-
Equitable
involvement of the community and Parent Teacher
Associations;
-
Capacity
development of a wide range of concerned actors;
and
-
Strengthening school-based monitoring systems.
Policy
level of SSHE
Central Government policy requires all states to
implement SSHE programmes as a priority and to
develop action plans to ensure education, water and
sanitation coverage of all schools. To promote
inter-sectoral coordination, a State Water and
Sanitation Mission has been constituted to act as a
task force. District committees coordinate and
supervise water and sanitation reforms, ensuring
inter-sectoral coordination of key district
departments and NGOs.
Capacity
building
Four regional resource centres exist to train state
and district level resource institutions for the
SSHE programme. Districts also use the District
Institute for Education and Training (DIET) for
capacity building.
Inter-sectoral
coordination
SSHE is an integrated intervention involving various
sectors, so inter-sectoral coordination is very
important. The Department of Drinking Water Supply
has made efforts to forge linkages between
departments (e.g. Department of Elementary Education
and Literacy (DEE&L), Health, Women and Child
Development, and Social Justice and Empowerment), to
ensure that the SSHE programme is prioritized.
Challenges
and responses
-
Policy - the
Government of India has provided political and
financial support for SSHE provision in all
rural government schools, with inter-sectoral
and inter-departmental coordination put in place
to meet goals set.
-
Monitoring -
monitoring of the programme covers physical and
financial coverage as well as tracking process
indicators, especially at school level. It is
planned to make regular use of an external
monitoring agency.
-
Hygiene education -
incorporating hygiene education into the
curriculum is problematic. Many initiatives have
been developed to this end, with the subject now
being an element of teacher training. This area
of the curriculum has been extended with funds
earmarked for it.
-
Construction and design
issues - technology and design issues in
construction have been prioritized in the
implementation of the TSC. Toilets are often not
child-friendly, coupled with inadequate
ventilation, light, water supply and hand
washing facilities.
-
Programme implementation
- even where the programme is in operation,
difficulties still exist. Concerns centre on the
provision of training programmes for effective
and focused implementation.
Lessons Learned
Financial investment per pupil for SSHE
-
No global
data exist on availability and conditions of
basic facilities for school water supply and
sanitation. However, UNICEF has begun to
collect information from 20 countries where it
supports major sanitation initiatives in primary
schools. The following figures for global
provision should be taken as only rough
estimates:
|
School water
supply |
300 million
children @ US$10 |
US$3billion |
|
School sanitation |
450 million children @ US$8 |
US$3.6 billion |
|
Hygiene education |
600 million children @ US$2 |
US$1.2 billion |
|
Total estimated cost |
|
US$7.8 billion |
There is urgent need for key indicators and further
surveys related to this.
Role of UNICEF in SSHE
In recent years, SSHE has received greater attention
in UNICEF’s Water, Environment and Sanitation (WES)
programmes, with SSHE projects now being undertaken
in over 40 countries. A review of these programmes
highlights the following issues:
-
the need for greater attention to school health
policies and health and nutrition services is
identified.
-
Life-skills-based education is being
increasingly used, particularly in the context
of HIV Aids.
-
Collaboration with education and health
programmes is emerging, with specific references
to child-friendly schools, Focusing Resources
for Effective School Health (FRESH) and
life-skills-based hygiene education.
-
There is enormous interest and potential for
sanitation and hygiene education programmes,
with FRESH identified as a useful concept.
-
UNICEF is expanding the review of SSHE
programmes for lesson learning and to identify
areas where support is needed.
Conclusions
The following points cover the major lessons learned
for achieving effective inter-sectoral cooperation:
-
Formal inter-sectoral
partnerships at local, regional, national and
global levels can advocate, coordinate and
cooperate with each other for better SSHE.
-
Effective school hygiene and health programmes
require a comprehensive approach,
combining skills-based
education with supporting policies, and full
integration into existing educational
structures.
-
Capacity building of stakeholders can create a
new and alternative vision.
Participatory and hands-on
techniques promote conditions for equal
participation by all stakeholders.
-
Partnerships should advocate for a clear, shared
vision with targets for rights- based,
child-friendly schools with
safe, hygienic environments and should develop
ambitious but achievable action plans.
-
A
proactive approach can facilitate the
acceleration of gender-sensitive school hygiene
improvement plans.
Priority needs to be given to safe, secure and
healthy schools, with budget allocation in
national and sector investment plans.
-
Schools can be motivated to achieve
child-friendly water, sanitation and handwashing
facilities. Teachers,
children and parents can learn more about
hygiene from the processes of design,
maintenance and monitoring.
Key
References
Khamal, S. et al (2005). The joy
of learning: Participatory lesson plans on hygiene,
sanitation, water, health and the environment. NEWAH,
Nepal; PLAN, Peru; The Zambian Ministry of
Education; Maji na Ufanisi, Kenya and IRC,
Netherlands.
Postma,
L., Getkate, R., and van Wijk, Christine
(2004).
Life skills-based hygiene education. A guidance
document on concepts, development and experiences
with life skills- based hygiene education in school
sanitation and hygiene education programmes.
Technical Paper no.42. Delft, IRC.
Snel, M.,
Shordt, K and Mooijman, A. (2004).
School
Sanitation and Hygiene Education Symposium - The way
forward: construction is not enough. Delft, IRC.
Snel, M.
et al. (2002). School Sanitation and
Hygiene
Education- India. Resource book. IRC and UNICEF -
New Delhi.
UNICEF/IRC
(2005). Water, sanitation and
hygiene
education for schools: Roundtable proceedings and
framework for action. New York.
UNICEF and
IRC (1998). Towards Better
Programming: a Manual on School Sanitation and
Hygiene. UNICEF, Water and Environmental Sanitation
Section. (Water, Environment and Sanitation
Technical Guidelines Series/UNICEF; no. 5).
World Bank
(2004). Toolkit on hygiene, sanitation
and water
in schools. Washington D.C. Available at
www.schoolsanitation.org
Zomerplaag,
J., and Mooijman, A. (2005).
Child-friendly hygiene and sanitation facilities in
schools: indispensable to effective hygiene
education. Technical paper series. No.47. Delft,
IRC.
For
further information contact:
WELL Water,
Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) Loughborough
University Leicestershire
LE11 3TU UK Email:
well@lboro.ac.uk Phone:
+44 (0)1509 228304 Fax:
+44 (0)1509 211079
BACK TO TOP
Home > Resources > Fact sheets > Child survival
|