Student
Discipline Committee
DISC12-M2
Minutes of the meeting of the Student Discipline Committee held on 12
June 2012.
Members: A M Mumford (Chair), R
Bhamra (ab), J
Blackwell, J B C Blood, R Bridger, L A Brown, S A Brown, P Childs (ab), F T Edum-Fotwe, F Fay (ab), N Honey (ab), H Midgely, A Muir, S Musgrave (ab), L Padolsey (ab), J Painter (ab), A Rae (ab), M Shuker
(ab), J A M Strong, A Watson (ab).
By invitation: S J Christie, P P
Conway (ab), J C Nutkins (ab),
C N Walker (ab), N Thomas.
In attendance: C Dunbobbin.
Apologies for absence: R Bhamra, P P
Conway, F Fay, N Honey, S Musgrave, J C Nutkins, A Rae, C N Walker.
________________________________________________________________
12/8 Minutes
DISC12-M1
The minutes of the meeting held on 14 February
2012 were confirmed as a true record.
12/9 Matters Arising from the
Minutes
9.1 Bans
from LSU Facilities (minute 12/2.1 refers)
The
issue of imposing bans from LSU premises, on the recommendation of Student
Disciplinary Panels was being considered by LSU as part of a wider review of
its student disciplinary procedures. It was agreed that the new LSU President
and Vice-President (Finance) would be briefed on this matter, and would bring
forward details of new procedures to the next meeting of the Committee in
November 2012. ACTION: R
Bridger
12/10 Committee Effectiveness
DISC12-P4
The following
points were noted:
i)
It was
agreed that the existing pattern of three meetings each academic year was
appropriate in view of the level of recurring business and to maintain the
active engagement of members.
ii)
The
Committee’s role was to take an overview of the operation of the University’s
student disciplinary activities, rather than to micro-manage specific
initiatives.
iii)
The minutes
of previous meetings should always be circulated in hard copy with agendas and
papers (as well as by email).
12/11 Review
of the
Impact of Students on the Local Community at the Start of the 2011-12 Academic
Year: Recommendations
DISC12-P5
11.1 The Committee welcomed the
progress made against the recommendations, and agreed that a further update
should be brought to the next meeting in November 2012. By that stage most of
the actions would have been completed and there would have been an opportunity
to consider their impact on the start of the 2012-13 academic year. Clarification was provided that the LSU President, and a range of relevant University staff
including the COO, the Director of Change Projects, the Director of Student
Services, the Security Manager and the Community Relations Officer had been
involved in taking forward the recommendations.
11.2 The Committee discussed a
proposal from the COO that an annual report be published to the local
community, containing statistical information on the numbers of minor and major
offences, and the range of penalties imposed, together with a short narrative.
Issues considered in a previous discussion (minute 11/17.1 refers) were touched
upon, and the Committee reiterated that it did not
support the publication of such information for the following reasons:
i)
Most
student discipline cases related to incidents which occurred on, and whose
impact was confined to the University campus.
ii)
The need
to preserve the anonymity of those involved meant that only broad summaries of
student discipline cases could be released, and without detailed information of
the full circumstances of each case, information on penalties imposed would
lack meaning, and would be likely only to give rise to further requests for information.
iii)
There was
a danger that details of student disciplinary cases would be presented by local
or national press in a way which impacted negatively on the reputation of the
University.
As an
alternative, the Committee proposed the publication of the following:
iv)
A
statement of the University’s commitment to investigate all complaints received
from members of the local community in relation to student misbehaviour,
and to report back to the complainant in a timely fashion with information on
the actions taken by the University and the outcome.
v)
Information
on the number of complaints received from members of the local community in
relation to student misbehaviour, and details of
actions taken and outcomes (including response times).
vi)
General
information on how the University deals with student disciplinary cases under
Ordinance XVII.
The Committee’s view was that the information in iv)-vi) would, on a
general level, help to reassure local groups that the
University took the issue of student discipline seriously and was concerned
about the impact of student antisocial behavior on local residents. It would
also help to satisfy those who contacted the University that attention had been
given to their specific complaint or concern.
It was noted in this
context that it was important that students received periodic reminders,
throughout the academic year, in relation to their responsibilities under
Ordinance XVII, and in relation to associated issues such as alcohol awareness.
12/12 Amendment to Ordinance
XVII: Repeat Minor Offenders
DISC12-P6
The Committee agreed to recommend to Senate and Council a proposal to
amend Ordinance XVII to allow the Chief Operating Officer more flexibility to
refer students who committed multiple Minor Offences for action under the Major
Offence procedures. The following points were noted in discussion:
i)
Where students who were found guilty of more than one minor offence were
referred for action under the major offence procedures, the COO would commission
an investigation into the matter as per the normal major offence procedures.
ii)
Progress still needed to be made to ensure the University was alerted to
all incidents of student misbehaviour (including
those dealt with by the police or LSU).
iii)
It was agreed that the Security Manager would consult with the COO
regarding a proposal that some or all authorised officers
be empowered to impose ‘on the spot’ fixed penalty fines for certain minor offences.
It was suggested that such powers would be particularly helpful to Security
Officers and Community Wardens in dealing with cases of noise disturbance in
the local community. ACTION: S Christie
12/13 Major Offences 2011-12 (up to 25 April 2012)
DISC12-P7
The Committee received a summary of Major Offences
dealt with by Student Disciplinary Panels in the 2011-12 academic year, up to 25 April 2012. It was noted that there had been
two cases where suspended fines had been activated because of a failure to
comply with a penalty imposed.
12/14 Minor Offences
DISC12-P8
The
Committee received a summary of Minor Offences reported during the period 7
February to 29 May 2012. The following points were noted in discussion:
i)
At a recent meeting of Hall Wardens, there had been
a discussion of a paper produced by the Chair of the Student Discipline
Committee, containing data on the number of minor offence cases and penalties
imposed across all Halls. It was evident that different approaches to
discipline existed, and some Wardens felt they were able to maintain good behaviour without imposing penalties under the minor
offence procedures. The Committee noted, however, that offences relating to
fire-safety were non-discretionary, and that penalties for such offences should
always be imposed.
ii)
It was agreed that future annual summaries of minor
offences should contain a comparison with previous years, broken down by
offence category. ACTION:
Secretary
iii)
Imago staff had been provided with equipment which
allowed them to better document cases of damage in halls, and this had resulted
in a significant fall in the number of successful appeals against charges for
damage.
iv)
Straightforward cases involving the possession of cannabis
in Halls were being dealt with by the relevant Hall Warden (having been initially
reported to the COO). However, it was not clear that the consistent approach to
penalties in such cases developed by Panels in recent years had been
communicated to Wardens. It was agreed that guidance would be issued. ACTION:
Secretary, N Thomas
12/15 Local Community Newsletters
DISC12-P9
The Committee received the most recent editions of the University and
LSU local resident’s newsletters, and noted that members had been added to the
mailing list for the University newsletter. Further LSU newsletters would be
circulated with future agendas. ACTION: Secretary
12/16 Valedictory
The Committee recorded its thanks to retiring
student members of the Committee.
12/17 Date of Meetings in 2012-13
Tuesday 30 October 2012, 2pm
Tuesday 5 February 2013, 2pm
Tuesday 4 June 2013, 10am
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Author – C Dunbobbin
June 2012
Copyright © Loughborough University. All rights reserved.