logo

 

 

 

 

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities

 

Faculty Board

 

SSH10-M1


Minutes

 

 

 

The Minutes of Meetings of the Faculty Board are posted on the Web for three years after the relevant date.

 

 

Minutes of the Meeting of the Faculty Board held on Tuesday 18 May 2010.

 

Members:  Professor Terry Kavanagh (Chair), Dr Malcolm Barnard, Jemima Barnes, Dr Anja Baumhoff, Grahame Boocock, Dr Paul Byrne, Dr Ian Campbell,  James Caroll, Dr Sudipto Chatterjee (ab), Professor Laurie Cohen, Dr Daniel Conway, Professor Duncan Cramer, Dr Jack Demaine (ab), Professor Alan France (ab), Dr Adrian Gourlay (ab), Dr John Harrison, Professor Elaine Hobby, Tony Hodgson, Dr David Howe, Professor Phil Hubbard,  Professor Angus Laing, Dr Jeremy Leaman, Professor Marsha Meskimmon, Dr Sabina Mihelj, Dr Jonathan Millett (ab), Professor Myra Nimmo, Dr Line Nyhagen Predelli, Professor Shirley Pearce (ab), Professor Eric Pentecost, Phil Sawdon (ab), Professor Anne Souchon, Ruth Stubbings, Professor Mark Webber, Mark Wright (ab)

 

Apologies for absence: Dr Sudipto Chatterjee, Dr Jack Demaine, Professor Alan France,

Dr Adrian Gourlay, Dr Jonathan Millett, Professor Shirley Pearce, Phil Sawdon, Mark Wright

 

In attendance:  Sally McKinley (Secretary)

 

1.         Minutes (SSH09-M2)

 

NOTED:  The minutes of the Meeting of the Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty Board, held on Tuesday 10 November 2009 were CONFIRMED with the following corrections:.

 

Item 19.2:  to read ‘the merger of the Department of Human Sciences within the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences’.

 

Item 24:  to read ‘it was agreed that it was important the very positive relationship of the University with the Students’ Union be maintained’.

 

2.         Matters Arising from the Minutes Not Appearing Elsewhere on the Agenda

 

2.1       Loughborough Design School

NOTED:  Congratulations were extended to the first Director of the Loughborough Design School, Tony Hodgson.  Operations Committee had approved the appointment of another Professor and was looking to appoint further strategic posts including a separate Director of Research Studies and Enterprise.  It was expected that a Senior Management Group would be established in August and an internal launch would take place in September.  The website would become live in July.  Building progress was on target for June 2011.

3.         Dean’s and Associate Dean’s Reports

3.1       The Dean

RECEIVED:  A verbal report from the Dean

(i)         Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research)

NOTED:  Professor Peter Golding was leaving the University in a few months.  Peter had been Head of the Department of Social Sciences for many years and subsequently as Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research) where he made a very significant contribution to the preparation of the last RAE and the recent ESRC bid between the University of Leicester and Loughborough University.  The Faculty extended their thanks and appreciation for all his work.

(ii)        Associate Dean (Teaching)

NOTED:  Dr Paul Byrne would be stepping down as Associate Dean (Teaching) at the end of the academic year.  Paul had maintained a high quality of teaching and learning in the Faculty.  Three candidates were being interviewed for the Associate Dean (Teaching) position next week.

(iii)       Financial position of the Faculty

NOTED:  Overall the Faculty would be leaving the current academic year in a good financial state.  Compared to some other universities, Loughborough University was in a strong position financially.  However, the financial future of HEIs was uncertain due to the new Government’s view of higher education.  Based on certain assumptions, the Faculty had been tasked with producing a financial plan to Directorate.  As a result the Faculty will be in deficit next year with Humanities in particular being hard hit.  This was no fault of the departments but largely due to funding being transferred to STEM subjects.

3.2       The Associate Dean (Teaching) (SSH10-P8)  

(i)         Recruitment

NOTED:  Recruitment figures were on target.  Home undergraduate recruitment demonstrated a slight downturn compared to last year which was in line with Faculty and University recruitment strategy.  This was the first year that the School of the Arts applicants were using the UCAS system.  International undergraduate applications were down by 22% (10% across the University) with the Business School, Economics, Social Sciences and the School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences attracting the majority of the applicants.  Departments were advised to re-examine their marketing for international students and to seek the International Office’s advice.  Home postgraduate taught recruitment remained a challenge although there had been a 19% increase in applications.  Departments were urged to look at postgraduate home recruitment particularly with respect to new collaborative programmes and the University was aiming to diversify international recruitment. 

(ii)        Report on Annual Programme Review

NOTED:  Every single programme was recruiting well.  Progression rate, attainment, employability were all very good.  External examiner reports were very positive and amongst the best in the country.  Student/Staff Liaison Committee meetings continued to demonstrate a very positive relationship.  Each School/Department had a relatively small number of issues which they had been asked to address and these will be followed up in subsequent APR/PPR’s.  

(iii)       National Student Survey

NOTED:  The final NSS response rate was 75.9% (slightly higher than previously) and 10% above the national average.  The Department of Geography had excelled with a 90% response rate and congratulations were extended to all departments for their hard work.

3.3       The Associate Dean (Research)

(i)         Studentships

NOTED:  Studentships had been made available, one per faculty, one development award per department and a Centenary Trust award consisting of two per Faculty.  Nominations for the studentships should be sent to Annette McQuillan.  In 2010 £1m would be made available to go towards 50 new studentships and would be advertised in the THES on Thursday.  It was envisaged there would be some intense competition and interested candidates were advised to look on the website immediately.  Departments were requested to make the information available to very top students (not more than 4 candidates per department) as soon as possible.  Department should then make a strategic case for these students.  John Feather was in the process of putting guidance notes together and the deadline for applications was 14 June 2010.  Departments should provide a ranked list by 22 June 2010 and the final decision will be made in early July. 

(ii)        REF

NOTED:  Representation was required on the next REF sub-panels and departments were requested to put together case studies of ongoing activity.  The AD(R) would enquire about the outcome of the May submissions.

(iii)       ESRC

NOTED:  A collaborative bid with the University of Leicester had been put forward.  The interim feedback so far had been very good and the seven referees were very positive.  Loughborough University would be responding to the feedback next week.  Thanks were extended to the departments who had put pathway documents together.

4.         Award of Degrees (tabled)

NOTED:  The award of Higher Degrees to candidates whose examinations had been conducted since the last meeting of Senate.

5.         Future Structure and Organisation of the University (SSH10-P9) 

RECEIVED:  A progress report from Professor Myra Nimmo and Professor Phil Hubbard.

NOTED:  The responses from the University had been taken into account in the University Structure Project Management Board Interim Report.  An alternative proposal was that the University would now be looking at seven to ten schools.  There was the possibility that the Faculty of Engineering would be retained as the School of Engineering. The PMB had tried to look at academic synergies and lab based subjects together and would be collating a final report to be submitted to ELT.  Thanks were extended to Professor Hubbard and Professor Nimmo for their input to the PMB. 

COMMENTED:  It was emphasised that there had been 36 responses to PMB’s initial report, not just one.  Some departments opposed the interim report because it was felt that robustness remained undefined.  The paper appeared to be inconsistent in its representation and although it had been put forward that ‘the case is strong for change’ it was believed by some that this was not the case.  It was felt that the interim proposal was simply a more elegant presentation of the original.  The view was that the proposals for new schools had not been articulated to students.  There was confusion about the main driver of the proposal and the argument for saving money was not convincing.  It was noted, however, that PMB had accepted that there will have to be a financial presentation from the Director of Finance and that PMB were anxious to put forward a finance report of recommendation to ELT for consideration.

It was reflected that the drivers pushing the change forward were complex and that robustness was more than financial matters, the maintenance of research and teaching and saving money, it was also about being an agent and manager of change.  Although there was no doubt that overlaps and synergies between departments could make cost savings, it was felt that other opportunities that may be presented should be considered.  These would include having a greater influence on University strategic thinking and direction by the new Deans of Schools.

AGREED:  It was recognised that the current Faculty structure was not fit for purpose and that Heads of Departments/Schools would benefit from a closer relationship with the centre.  PMB needed to clearly articulate the changing arrangements, provide a broader view and a look to the future.

6.         Value for Money Projects

RECEIVED:  A verbal report from Caroline Walker, Director of Finance.

NOTED:  Loughborough University was very successful financially being in surplus overall with a plan for that to continue.  However, there were challenges ahead.  Higher Education will not be exempt from cuts and it was likely in 2-3 years the University would not remain in surplus.  The University was following its ‘Silver Scenario’ 5 year plan and the modelling showed that if the University made savings by only 1-2% the University would go into deficit.  The University therefore required more efficiency savings of 2-3% (£14m).  Projects to tackle this had been identified by ELT:

(i)         Raising income University-wide  – some potential but not as it was in the past.

(ii)        Procurement – trading available for booking rooms and internal charges.

(iii)       Simplicity agenda – increase efficiency of student administration, finance, HR procedures.

(iv)       Increase income generation.

(v)       Increase services working together – non-academic departments to reduce duplication.

(vi)       Energy – reduce this in line with the Carbon Agenda.

(vii)      Look to increase institutional robustness.

(viii)     Examine the total cost of ownership and IT support.

The reality was that the University will need to generate more income and possibly have less staff in 5 years time.  There would be natural staff losses due to retirements and it was hoped that changes would be made without compulsory redundancies.

COMMENTED:  While the Board applauded the University’s mission in ‘doing more for less’, concern was expressed that although the University had a history of being risk averse and prudent, departments still needed to have the opportunity to invest strategically.  It was also felt that fees, robustness and hidden costs and savings were not always clear in business plans.  It was explained that these were not hidden and there was a difference between recurrent and non recurrent savings that get accumulated.  It was assumed that fees will be increased, banked and matched with spend on scholarships and bursaries but no policy statement had been issued yet. It was agreed that more effective management was required in order to better respond to the challenges ahead.         

7.         Graduate Destination Data (SSH10-P10)

RECEIVED:  A presentation from David Lilley, Careers Advisor, Careers Centre.

NOTED:    The two pie charts in the report had been transposed on pages 35 and 36.  The chart for Social Sciences on page 35 was that for the School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences on page 36. The Faculty had recorded a further fall, compared to 2008, in the percentage of graduates in employment six months after graduation alongside an increase in the percentage taking on non-graduate roles.  Recruitment activities were very varied with banking being particularly badly affected but this was not widespread.  The largest ever Careers Fair found employers interested despite the recession.  The message was that graduates must be focussed and prepare and market themselves effectively.  The Faculty’s diversity was reflected within individual departmental statistics.  Unemployment dropped amongst graduates from arts and sports-related subjects and rose in Design and Technology, Economics and Geography.  There was a noticeable positive trend of students on non-placement courses in the light of taking a year off.  The Graduate Recruitment and Placement Fair had advertised work placements for students this year.  The Careers Centre at Loughborough continued to expand its Loughborough University Alumni database and remained a useful resource for students.  The Springboard Careers Fair was aimed at students mostly from the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities.  The Loughborough University employability award which had strong ties with the Faculty was launched in 2010 and would be launched again in 2011.  The target was 400 students with an actual figure of 353 student registrations, 605 from the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities.  A Government funded graduate internship programme for graduates not successfully employed was launched in 2008-09 and would be regionally managed by De Montfort University.  The target was 370 internships by September 2010.  Case studies of success stories will be available to departments shortly.

8.                     Associate Dean (Teaching) Action

RATIFIED:  Actions taken by the Associate Dean (Teaching) in approving the following:

i.          Waivers of Programme Regulations

ii.          Appointment of Programme Boards

iii.         Credit Transfers

Further details of the actions were available from the Faculty Board Secretary upon request.

 

9.         Personal Titles

 

NOTED:  The award of personal titles and to offer the Faculty’s congratulations:

Dr Tracy Bhamra, Chair in Sustainable Design (from November 2009)

Dr Clive Edwards, Chair in Design History (from November 2009)

Dr Eddie Norman, Chair in Design Education (from November 2009)

Dr Elizabeth Stokoe, Chair in Social Interaction (from December 2009)

Dr Barry Bogin, Chair in Biological Anthropology (from April 2009)

 

10.       Curriculum Sub-Committee

10.1     New Programme Proposals

NOTED:  That Curriculum Sub-Committee will be recommending to Learning and Teaching Committee (subject to any matters being resolved to the satisfaction of the ADT) prior to their meeting on 3 June 2010, the following new programme proposals:

(i)      The full-time MSc in Sport Coaching from the School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences commencing October 2010

(ii)     The part-time Postgraduate Certificate in Back Care Management from the Business School commencing June 2010.

(iii)    The part-time Postgraduate Certificate/Diploma/Master of Science in Healthcare Emergency Preparedness and Business Continuity Management from the Business School commencing October 2010.

(iv)    The part-time Postgraduate Diploma and Master of Science in Healthcare Fire Safety Management from the Business School commencing October 2010.

 

(v)     The full-time BSc, DPS Design Ergonomics from the Loughborough Design School with effect from October 2011.

10.2     Discontinuation of a Programme

NOTED:  That Curriculum Sub-Committee will be recommending to Learning and Teaching Committee prior to their meeting on 3 June 2010, the discontinuation of the following programmes:

(i)         The MSc Occupational Health from the School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences.

(ii)        The MSc European and International Studies from the Department of Politics, History and International Relations with immediate cessation.

10.3     Proposal to suspend a programme

NOTED:  That Curriculum Sub-Committee will be recommending to Learning and Teaching Committee prior to their meeting on 3 June 2010, the proposal to suspend the MRes in Criminology and Justice from the Department of Social Sciences.  Date of last intake 28 September 2009, proposed date of next intake when anticipated recruitment is resumed 3 October 2011.

 

11.       Staff/Student Committees

NOTED:  That reports of the Staff/Student Committee meetings had been deposited with the Faculty Board Secretary as follows:

Department of Social Sciences

18 March, 29 April and 19 November 2009

Department of Geography

9 June, 28 October 2009

MSc Management/MSc International Management/MSc Marketing & Management/MSc Finance & Management/MSc Business Analysis & Management (Business School)

2 December 2009

MBA (Business School)

20 April 2010

Department of Economics

11 November 2009, 10 March 2010

Department of English and Drama

10 March 2009

 

12.       Faculty Board Membership

NOTED:  Vacancies for membership of the Faculty Board for the session 2010-2011:

School of the Arts (1)

Business School (1)

Department of Social Sciences (1)

Department of Economics (1)

Department of Geography (2)

 

13.       Date of Next Meeting

The next Faculty Board meeting will take place prior to a Directorate meeting on 9 November 2010.

 

Author – Ms S J McKinley
May 2010

Copyright (c) Loughborough University. All rights reserved.