Senate
Subject: Proposals
for Changes to the Composition of Committees required under the New University
Structure
Origin: Structure Implementation Project Management Board and Academic
Governance Working Group
Executive Summary:
This paper summarises the proposals from the
Academic Governance Group, endorsed by the Project Management Board, for changes
to the composition and terms of reference of major Committees required under
the new University structure. It also proposes that the current informal IT
Committee be incorporated into the committee structure. Changes to remaining
committees which are still under discussion will be brought to Senate in July.
Action
Required:
Senate is asked to approve the specific
recommendations with a view their submission to Council on 1 April 2011.
Background
The Academic
Governance Working Group has undertaken a review of the composition of all
major University committees in light of the changes to the University
structure. The Committees were initially grouped into those which required
amendment and those which would be unaffected.
Where the
remit of a committee which requires amendment falls within the remit of one of
the other structure implementation working groups, there has generally been
interaction between that group and the Governance Group. Where this is not the case,
the committee concerned has generally been asked to consider proposals for
amendments. As the work has progressed and current arrangements have been
reviewed by the relevant groups, proposals have also emerged for some specific
changes to the committee structure.
In the attached proposals,
3 School Deans are proposed to act as representatives of all the Schools, replacing
the 3 Faculty Deans, on three important committees. The number of 3 Deans has
been chosen because it was felt to be the smallest number that would enable
reasonable reflection of the diversity of disciplines across the University and
to guarantee that issues of availability did not risk the School Deans being
unrepresented at some meetings.
The following papers
setting out further details are attached:
·
Annex A setting out detailed proposals on the committees relating to
Learning & Teaching, Research and Enterprise
·
Annex B Proposed Terms of Reference and Composition of the IT Committee
Senate is asked to consider
and approve for onward transmission to Council:
1.
The recommendations for changes to the composition and terms of reference
of Learning & Teaching Committee and Research Committee (Annex A).
Proposals for revised terms of reference for the Research Committee will be
tabled as they are currently being revised to include reference to the Research
Schools and Graduate School and a stronger statement about the enhancement of
the experience of research students.
2.
The recommendation for the creation of a new Enterprise Committee to be
a joint committee of Senate and Council. The current Enterprise Board is to be
renamed the Enterprise Advisory Board and to become a sub-committee of the
Enterprise Committee whilst providing independent input to Council via Senate
and the Enterprise Committee. Recommendations for the compositions and terms of
reference are set out in Annex A.
The PVC(E) has indicated that the future of the
current Enterprise Projects Group is under consideration in light of external
factors.
3.
The recommendation that the Faculty Deans not be replaced in the
composition of Operations Committee. Deans of School will be invited to attend
when required to present major proposals from their Schools.
4.
That the 3 Faculty Deans be replaced by 3 School Deans on the following
committees:
Health, Safety and Environment
Human Resources
Advancement
5.
That the current 3 Faculty and 3 Senate representatives on the Prizes
Committee be replaced by 5 School representatives to serve for three years and
to be rotated to ensure membership from all 10 Schools staggered over time.
6.
That the Head of Department included in the composition of Estates
Management Committee be re-designated as a Head of School.
7.
The formalisation of the existing IT Committee with the terms of
reference and set out in Annex B. It is proposed that the IT Committee be a
joint committee of Senate and Council. The composition of the committee is
still under discussion and final proposals will be presented to Senate in July.
8.
Honorary Degrees Committee and Medal Committee - It is proposed that
these committees be combined into one (Honorary Degrees and University Medal
Committee) with the following composition:
Vice-Chancellor (Chair)
Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor
3 PVCs
Chief Operating Officer
Director of Development and Alumni Relations
This
is a similar composition to the present Honorary Degrees Committee excluding
the Faculty Deans and replacing the Director of Finance with the Director of
Development and Alumni Relations. It is envisaged that School Deans and Heads
of Support Services will make and comment on proposals for awards but will not
take part in final decisions.
Copyright ©
Loughborough University. All rights reserved.