Senate
Subject:
Origin: Robert
Bowyer / Chris Dunbobbin
1. Background
At its
meeting on 4 July 2007, Senate AGREED that a final decision to approve the
validation of degree programmes at BUE should be deferred until the BUE
Validation Sub-Committee had considered in September 2007, key aspects of the
further material requested from BUE by the end of August, by which time reports
would also be available from the planned scrutiny of student work from Semester
2 by subject specialists. Senate delegated authority to the Sub-Committee to
approve the validation on its behalf in September if it judged the documentation
received to be satisfactory.
2. BUE Validation Sub-Committee
Meetings in September 2007
The BUE
Validation Sub-Committee met on 5 September 2007. It received:
(i) an
update on BUE staffing.
(ii) a
report from the AD(T)(BUE) on the reports from subject specialist advisers
(SSAs) on the standard of student work and the standards of marking, as
demonstrated by samples of semester 2 student work received from BUE in July.
(iii) a
statement from BUE on progress with development of its library facilities and staffing,
and a statement on progress with staff development.
In the
light of its discussions on the further material provided by BUE, the
Sub-Committee resolved that the validation of BUE degree programmes be
approved.
The
Sub-Committee agreed that developments in respect of library provision and
staff development could now be followed up through the monitoring and review
procedures approved by Senate at its July meeting. Matters identified in relation to the student
work provided by BUE would be followed up by the AD(T)(BUE) in the first
instance and subsequently through the general monitoring and review procedures.
It was
noted that in approving the validation, the University was committing itself to
7 cohorts of BUE students, starting with the first intake who commenced the
preparatory year in September 2005 and degree studies in 2006. There would be a re-validation by LU in
spring 2010.
The
Sub-Committee met again on 12 September to receive initial comments from the
SSAs on updated programme and module documentation for 2007/08, as well as a
large amount of material supplied by BUE following up essential actions
identified in the institutional and subject validation reports. The Registry is developing means of charting
progress on individual items to support the monitoring and review
processes. Decisions have to be taken on
what issues should be covered in the first annual institutional and programme
reviews.
3. Subsequent Developments
Bill
Simpson, retiring
Discussions
are ongoing in relation to BUE’s intended recruitment of a UK Staff
Development Adviser.
Author
– Robert Bowyer/ Chris Dunbobbin
Date –
November 2007
Copyright ©
Loughborough University. All rights
reserved.