SENATE

 

SEN09-M7

 

 

Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Senate on Tuesday 17 November 2009.

 

 

 

 

Jo Aldridge

Simon Austin

Chris Backhouse

Alan Bairner

Morag Bell

David Berry (ab)

Richard Bibb

Jon Binner

Ed Brown (ab)

James Carroll

Jim Chandler

Mike Cropper

Sandra Dann

David Deacon (ab)

Jack Demaine

Phill Dickens

Neil Dixon

Alistair Gibb (ab)

Neil Halliwell

Jon Harper (ab)

 

Shirley Pearce

 

Daniel Harris

Janet Harrison (ab)

Roger Haslam

Elaine Hobby

Tony Hodgson

Phil Hubbard

Ruth Jenkins (ab)

Terry Kavanagh

Ruth Kinna

Feo Kusmartsev (ab)

Chris Linton

Ruth Lister

Graham Matthews

Julian Mackenzie (ab)

Marsha Meskimmon

Myra Nimmo

Paul Palmer (ab)

Rob Parkin

Brian Parkinson

Ken Parsons

 

 

 

Chris Peel

Eric Pentecost

Iain Phillips

Ian Reid (ab)

Stephen Rice (ab)

Chris Rielly

Carol Robinson

Richard Stobart (ab)

Elizabeth Stokoe

Gerry Swallowe (ab)

Tony Thorpe

David Twigg (ab)

Yiannis Vardaxoglou (ab)

Scott Vickers

Peter Warwick

Andrew Watson

Mark Webber (ab)

John Whittaker

Huaizhong Zhao

 

In attendance: Rob Allan, Chris Dunbobbin, Jennifer Nutkins, Caroline Walker.

                                               

Apologies for absence were received from: Dave Berry, Ed Brown, David Deacon, John Harper, Janet Harrison, Ruth Jenkins, Feo Kusmartsev, Paul Palmer, Ian Reid, Stephen Rice, Richard Stobart, Gerry Swallowe, Dave Twigg, Yiannis Vardaxoglou.

 

 

The Vice-Chancellor welcomed new members to the meeting.

 

09/107 Minutes

Senate RESOLVED to confirm and sign the Minutes of the Ordinary meeting held on 1 July 2009 (SEN09-M5), subject to the following corrections:

 

09/65(ii): “The University was in detailed discussions with Rolls-Royce, emda, and Advantage West Midlands with a view to becoming a partner in the Midlands Technology Centre and others to establish the Manufacturing Technology Centre.”

 

09/65(iii): “One of the University's spinout companies, Phase Vision Ltd, had successfully concluded a funding round of £1.1M£1.4M, which was expected to allow the company to develop to profitability.”

 

09/84: Should have referred to am and pm Graduation Ceremonies on Tuesday 21 July 2009, rather than am only.

 

09/108 Powers and Functions of Senate

SEN09-P111

Senate NOTED the powers and functions of Senate.

 

09/109 University Strategy/Planning

SEN09-P112

Senate considered the outcome of the Review of University Strategy following the Joint Senate/Council meeting held on 9 October 2009. Thanks were given to Fidelma Hannah and the Planning Office team for producing the report, and to all who contributed to the Away Day.

 

Discussions at the Away Day had centred on eight cross-cutting themes, and had been set in the context of an external environment that had changed significantly since the development of the Strategy in 2006, and which was likely to continue to be challenging and uncertain in the foreseeable future. Nonetheless, the discussions indicated that the overall strategy remained relevant and achievable.

 

            The following points were noted in discussion:

 

(i)                  Any proposed changes to the organisational structure would be brought to Senate for consideration and approval.

(ii)                It would be important (in the context of references to the University’s large, green campus, in the Reputation and Advancement section of the report), to maintain a balance between the provision of specialist facilities for elite-level athletes, and of Multi Use Games Areas (MUGAs) for more general sporting participation.

(iii)               There was some discussion about where the University currently stood in relation to its stated aspirations for 2016. Within the UK, Loughborough was regularly ranked within the top 15 universities, and a target to be within the top ten was not therefore unrealistic. Internationally, the University was currently placed 235th, and a top 100 ranking was therefore ambitious. In relation to sport, there was no recognised league table, but anecdotal evidence suggested that Loughborough was already perceived internationally as being one of the very best universities for sport.

(iv)              There was an important role for e-learning in the maintenance of the University’s high-quality and distinctive learning and teaching experience, as referred to in the Student Learning Experience section of the report. To this end, a Head of E-Learning, and an E-Learning Advisory Group had been established, and it was intended that there would be significant student involvement in this area.

 

            Senate RESOLVED to recommend that Council approve the outcome of the Review.

 

09/110 Proposals to establish the Loughborough Design School

            SEN09-P113

Senate RESOLVED to recommend to Council that a proposal to establish a new academic unit named the Loughborough Design School, bringing together the current Departments of Design and Technology and Ergonomics with the Ergonomics and Safety Research Centre, be approved. Thanks were given to Tony Hodgson, Roger Haslam, and John Richardson for their work on the proposal.

 

The following points were noted in discussion:

 

(i)                  The establishment of the School represented an excellent example of interdisciplinary collaboration, which would have a significant impact on the design community.

(ii)                It was not intended that the School would be the exclusive provider of design-based research and teaching at the University. Rather, it would sit within a broader continuum of design research and interact with other Schools and Departments across campus.

(iii)               With regard to the provision of feedback to students on assessments, as well as in other areas, the School would seek to identify and build upon the best practices of its constituent members.

(iv)              The name Loughborough Design School had been chosen following significant deliberation and consultation, and was felt to benefit from being general, simple and inclusive. There was some discussion about the practice of using the words ‘Loughborough’ or ‘Loughborough University’ in the names of Schools and Departments, and it was noted that it might be appropriate to consider this issue further in the future. However, at present, there was a desire to be flexible in this area, and to recognise that departments operated in different contexts and therefore had distinct requirements in terms of how they were named. It was recognised also, that in practice, departments might be referred to by different names for internal and external purposes.

 

09/111 Proposal for a Change to the name of the Loughborough University School of Art and Design
SEN09-P114

Senate RESOLVED to approve a proposal to change the name of the Loughborough University School of Art and Design (LUSAD) to the School of Arts at Loughborough University (SALU) with effect from 1 August 2010. Following on from the discussion under item 09/110(iv), it was noted that the School would wish to be referred to simply as the School of the Arts for internal purposes.

 

09/112 Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research)

 

112.1   REF Developments

Work had been ongoing to prepare Loughborough’s response to the REF consultation document. This would be considered by ELT prior to being submitted on or before 16 December 2009. Mechanisms were in place to ensure the University remained in touch with developments, and it was noted in this context that a delegation from Loughborough would be attending a meeting at Nottingham University with HEFCE’s REF team on 4 December 2009.

 

It was currently being proposed that the REF would focus on three main elements: Outputs (60%), Impact (25%), and Environment (15%), and that HEIs would submit portfolios of research in 2012 for assessment in 2013, with results published in December 2013 to determine funding from 2014. It was also intended that there would be a reduction in the number of subject panels, as compared to the last RAE. It was emphasised, however, that it remained possible, through the consultation, to influence the nature and timing of the process. Specifically, it had been suggested that a case might be made for moving the above timetable back by one year. It was also possible that the proportion of the assessment based on Impact would be reduced. However, given the existing economic climate, it seemed unlikely that the Impact element would be discarded entirely even if there was a change of government in 2010. It was noted, in any case, that depending on exactly how Impact was defined and measured, Loughborough might be expected to perform well in this area.

 

SEN09-P115

112.2   Research Applications – Quarterly Analysis by Department

            NOTED.

 

            SEN09-P116

112.3   New Research Grants and Contracts

            NOTED.

 

09/113 Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)

           

SEN09-P117

113.1   Student Recruitment

Senate RECEIVED a report on full-time undergraduate and taught postgraduate recruitment outcomes for 2009 entry. It had been a very successful year, and thanks were given to all involved. The following points were highlighted in particular:

 

(i)                  At undergraduate level, A level entry grades had increased across the Faculties, there had been very few concessions, and no offers to new applicants in Clearing.

(ii)                The new visa system had not impacted negatively upon recruitment, in part because the visa letters produced by the University had been exemplary.

(iii)               Recruitment targets for UK/EU taught postgraduate students had been exceeded, in part because of the impact of the recession, but also as a result of more vigorous promotional activity, accompanied by scholarship and bursary schemes.

(iv)              International recruitment remained reliant on students from China, but the University had regained its recognition as an approved institution for US Federal Loans, and a strategy to expand recruitment activity in the US was being developed by the International Office.

(v)                The new UCAS Adjustment Period had not had any significant impact; just 9 students had moved from Loughborough to another institution. (Loughborough had indicated early in the process that it would not accept any adjustment students).

(vi)              A paper would be submitted to Operations Committee concerning financial adjustments for Departments that had not met recruitment targets.

 

            SEN09-P118

113.2   National Student Survey (NSS)

The University had again received a good set of results, albeit that the response rate was down slightly on 2008. Based on question 22, students’ overall satisfaction with their course, Loughborough was ranked 4th among publicly funded institutions in the UK. Overall, results at institutional level were stable, and there were a number of exceptional results at subject level. However, in some subject areas results had been disappointing, and these would be the focus of particular attention in preparation for the 2010 survey. Other institutions were working hard to improve their ranking, and it was important that Loughborough maintained its commitment to the exercise. Thanks were given to LSU for its work in encouraging students to engage with the survey.

 

It was noted that since its inception, NSS outcomes had prompted a number of initiatives at institutional level, and in 2009-10 one of the priorities would be to seek to clarify student expectations in relation to the supervision and marking of final year projects and dissertations.

 

It was noted finally that some students had given negative feedback about being repeatedly encouraged to take part in the NSS, and there was concern that this might translate into less favourable responses to the survey itself. In order to counter such difficulties, one department had already invited student representatives to begin asking final year students how they would prefer to be contacted about the survey. Other suggestions to maximise response rates included appealing to the competitive nature of students (e.g. by comparing the response rate of their course/department to others), and providing facilities to complete the survey (i.e. networked computers) immediately after giving a reminder.

 

113.3   British University in Egypt (BUE)

Senate RECEIVED an update on the University’s partnership with the BUE.

 

Senate was pleased to note that BUE had graduated its first 113 students in Business Studies, Economics, Informatics and Computer Science, and Political Science, at a very successful ceremony on 25 October 2009. However, whilst academic standards had been maintained, an unexpectedly high level of input had been required from Loughborough staff during the summer in relation to the operation of Programme Boards and the administration of student appeals.

 

Loughborough was working with BUE to address the issues that had arisen, and the PVC(T) had set out clearly the principles which would need to apply to the Loughborough validated programmes in the future. BUE had been asked to confirm, by the end of November 2009, that it accepted these principles, which should reduce the demands placed on the Loughborough staff involved. Subject to this acceptance being given, preparations would begin in earnest for the scheduled revalidation process in 2010, which would consist of a series of exercises over a period of several months.

 

It was noted in discussion that the BUE partnership provided an excellent opportunity for Loughborough to raise its profile in the region and engage in collaborative research links.

 

09/114 Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Enterprise)

            SEN09-P119

            Senate RECEIVED a report from the PVC(E). The following points were highlighted.

 

(i)                  Science and Enterprise Park: The process to select a single developer was ongoing, and a Selection Panel had met with the four remaining candidates in the previous week. A final decision was anticipated in June 2010.

(ii)                Manufacturing Technology Centre: A grant of £40.4M from the Central Projects Review Group had now been confirmed. Thanks were given to the PVC(E) and his team for their work on this project.

(iii)               Lachesis Fund: A £2M bid for ERDF funding had now been finalised.

(iv)              Consultancy: For the year ending July 2009, over £1M had been returned to University departments by LUEL. This was the first time that the £1M barrier had been broken in a single year.

 

09/115 Matters for Report by the Vice-Chancellor

 

115.1Recent Developments at the University

The Vice-Chancelllor reported on the following matters:

 

(i) University Challenge: The Loughborough team had put up a spirited defence in a programme showed on the previous evening, and had achieved the highest losing score. Thanks were given to the PVC(R) for organising the involvement of the Loughborough team, and to the team itself, which had performed so well. Trials for the next series were already underway, and members were asked to help in identifying potential team members from their departments.

 

(ii) Pay Negotiations: UCEA had offered to engage in further talks, but had indicated that it would not be prepared to increase its offer. It appeared, therefore, that an impasse had been reached, and further developments were awaited.

 

(iii) Singapore Sports Initiative: In July 2007, Senate had received a paper containing proposals for the establishment of a University Institute in Singapore for teaching, research and enterprise in sport, exercise and health. The University was now pursuing a relatively small-scale initiative relating to sports technology, led by Professor Roy Jones. Senate would be advised of any major developments.

 

(iv) University Technical Colleges: Lord Baker had recently spoken in support of the establishment of University Technical Colleges and the Vice-Chancellor had been quoted as a supporter of the initiative. No commitments had in fact been made, although the University had undertaken some initial discussions with Loughborough College about the proposals.

 

SEN09-P120

115.2   Policy Developments for HE in the UK

Senate RECEIVED a paper highlighting recent developments in HE policy that would have an impact on the University and on the environment in which it operated. Members were encouraged to alert the VC’s Office if they were aware of any additional relevant items.

 

09/116 Programme Proposals

SEN09-P121

On the recommendation of Learning and Teaching Committee, on the advice of Curriculum Sub-Committee, Senate RESOLVED to recommend to Council as appropriate:

 

116.1   New programmes (with effect from October 2010 unless stated):

            MA Art and the Public Sphere

            MRes Art, Design and Performance by Practice

            BSc, DPS/DIntS Mathematics with Mathematics Education

MSc Efficient Fossil Energy Technologies (Curriculum-based component of the EngD) (with effect from October 20009)

            PGCert in Management for Engineers (ECITB) (with effect from September 2009)

 

116.2   Award, title or major programme changes

Professional Graduate Certificate in Education: Exit Award for MSc Education with QTS

BSc Information Technology and Mathematics to BSc Applied Computing and Mathematics (with effect from October 2007 intake)

            MSc Coaching to MSc Sport Coaching (with effect from October 2009 intake)

MSc Mathematical Processes in Finance to MSc Mathematical Finance (with effect from October 2010 intake)

           

116.3   Discontinuation of programmes (last intake shown in brackets):

MSc Industrial Sales and Strategic Marketing (October 2004)

MDes Product Design in Business (October 2008) (MA/MSc routes continue)

MEng Electrical and Renewable Energy Systems Engineering (October 2009)

MEng Electronics and Software Engineering (October 2009)

BEng/MEng Electronic and Electrical Engineering (Control and Power/ Digital Communications/Microelectronics) (October 2009)

MEng Electronic and Electrical Engineering (Renewable Energy) (October 2009)

MEng Systems Engineering (Aeronautical/ Control and Power/Human Factors/Renewable Energy) (October 2009)

BSc Publishing with E-Business (October 2009)

 

09/117 Learning and Teaching Committee

            On the recommendation of Learning and Teaching Committee, Senate RESOLVED:

 

            SEN09-P122

117.1   Constitution and Membership

To approve amendments to the Constitution and Membership of Learning and Teaching Committee.

 

            SEN09-P123

117.2   Terms of Reference

To approve amendments to the Terms of Reference of Learning and Teaching Committee.

 

            SEN09-P124

117.3   Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, Singapore

To receive the report of a Validation Panel on programmes to be delivered by NAFA in collaboration with Loughborough University School of Art and Design, and approve recommendations.

 

            SEN09-P125

117.4   Regulation XXIII Validated Undergraduate Awards (Higher Education in UK Further Education Colleges)

To approve the establishment of Regulation XXIII Validated Undergraduate Awards (Higher Education in UK Further Education Colleges).

 

            SEN09-P126

117.5   Undergraduate Reassessment

To note the impact of changes to the Regulations and arrangements relating to undergraduate reassessment.

 

09/118 Amendment to Ordinance XXXIII

            SEN09-P127

Senate NOTED the action of the Chair of Senate, on behalf of Senate, in recommending to Council an amendment to Ordinance XXXIII (Diplomas and Certificates), in order to accommodate the award of the Professional Graduate Certificate in Education as an additional exit award for the MSc in Education with QTS.

 

09/119 PhD Programme in Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and their Applications

SEN09-P128

On the recommendation of Research Committee, Senate RESOLVED to approve the introduction of a PhD programme in Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and their Applications with immediate effect, subject to approval of the taught element of the programme.

 

09/120 Amendment to the Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research

            SEN09-P129

Senate NOTED the action of the Chair of Senate, on behalf of Senate, in approving a minor amendment to the Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research.

 

09/121 Research Performance Monitoring Group

            SEN09-P130

Senate RECEIVED reports of the meetings held on 20 April, 7 July, 25 September, and 27 October 2009, and RESOLVED to approve:

 

SEN09-P131

121.1   Amendments to the Terms of Reference of Research Performance Monitoring Group (minute 3 of the report of the meeting on 25 September 2009 refers).

 

09/122 Health, Safety and Environmental Committee

            SEN09-P132 (to follow)

Senate RECEIVED a report of the meeting held on 29 October 2009, and RESOLVED to approve:

 

122.1   An amendment to the membership of Health, Safety and Environmental Committee (the minute on Committee Effectiveness refers).

 

            SEN09-P133

122.2   The Annual Plan for the Health, Safety and Environment Office.

 

09/123 Membership of Senate 2009-10

            SEN09-P134

            The membership of Senate for 2009-10 was NOTED.

 

09/124 Librarian’s Annual Report 2008-09

Senate NOTED that the annual report for 2008-09 from the Librarian was available at  http://www.lboro.ac.uk/library/about/PDFs/annrep08-09.pdf.

 

09/125 Reports from Committees

            Senate RECEIVED reports from the following Committees:

 

125.1   SEN09-P135   Costing and Pricing Committee of 23 July and 7 September 2009.

125.2   SEN09-P136   Enterprise Board of 16 October 2009.

125.3   SEN09-P137   Estates Management Committee of  28 July and 22 September 2009.

125.4   SEN09-P138   Performance Monitoring Group of 26 June.

125.5   SEN09-P139   Research Committee of 5 November 2009.

 

09/126 Dates of Future Meetings in 2009-10

            Wednesday 27 January 2010, 9.15am (if necessary)

            Wednesday 3 March 2010, 9.15am

            Wednesday 30 June 2010, 9.15am


Author – Chris Dunbobbin

Date – November 2009

Copyright © Loughborough University.  All rights reserved