SENATE

 

SEN07-M5

 

Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Senate on Wednesday 21 November 2007.

 

 

 

 

Memis Acar (ab)

Jo Aldridge

David Allen

Chris Backhouse (ab)

Anja Baumhoff

Morag Bell

David Berry

Jon Binner

Ed Brown

Paul Chung

Sandra Dann (ab)

Simon Darvill

Ian Davidson

James Dearnley (ab)

Neil Dixon

Sophie Driscoll

Clive Edwards

Peter Golding

Keith Gregory

 

Shirley Pearce

 

Neil Halliwell

Jon Harper

Roger Haslam

Emma Herod (ab)

Elaine Hobby

Tony Hodgson

Ray Jones

Terry Kavanagh

David Kerr (ab)

Feo Kusmartsev (ab)

Chris Linton

Julian Mackenzie (ab)

Danny McNiece

Marsha Meskimmon

Mary Morley

Myra Nimmo

Charles Oppenheim

Rob Parkin

Ken Parsons

 

 

Eric Pentecost

Jonathan Potter

Gareth Pritchard

Ian Reid

Peter Render

Chris Rielly

Steve Rothberg

Dennis Smith (ab)

Gerry Swallowe

Tim Swift

Tony Thorpe

Rob Thring (ab)

David Twigg

Yiannis Vardaxoglou (ab)

Richard Wakeman (ab)

Peter Warwick

David Whalley (ab)

Peter Winter

Dominic Wring

 

In attendance: Chris Dunbobbin, Fidelma Hannah (for items 07/81-07/83), Jennifer Nutkins, Will Spinks

                                                           

Apologies for absence were received from: Memis Acar, Sandra Dann, James Dearnley,
Emma Herod, David Kerr, Julian Mackenzie, Dennis Smith, Rob Thring, Yiannis Vardaxoglou,
Richard Wakeman, David Whalley

 

 

The Vice-Chancellor welcomed the University’s new Chief Operating Officer, Will Spinks, and all others for whom it was their first meeting.

 

07/79  Minutes

 

It was RESOLVED to confirm and sign the Minutes of the Ordinary meeting held on 4 July 2007 (SEN07-M3), subject to amendments to the final sentence of 07/34 (Loughborough Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Singapore), as follows: “It was noted in discussion that it was likelypossible that Loughborough’s presence in Singapore wouldcould trigger a tax liability, and the implications of the extent of this were being investigated.”

 

07/80  Powers and Functions of Senate

                                               

SEN07-P69

            Senate NOTED the powers and functions of Senate.

 

07/81  University Strategy

 

            SEN07-P70

Senate RECEIVED a report from the Deputy Vice-Chancellor on monitoring and review arrangements for the University Strategy implementation plans. The aim was to fully integrate for the first time the strategic and financial planning processes for departments and support services with the University’s overall strategy.

 

The progress reporting structure was a digested version of the full implementation plans, and did not therefore contain all points of detail. Senate would welcome more explicit emphasis on development of the Library as the Learning & Teaching and Research implementation plans were taken forward. It was confirmed that plans for investment in the Sports Development Centre would be monitored closely for value for money.

 

07/82  Advancement

 

            SEN07-P71, SEN07-P72

Senate RECEIVED an update on steps taken in relation to the Development aspect of Advancement since the last meeting, and NOTED the following in particular:

 

i)                    The University had appointed Ron Gray (currently Director of Development and Alumni Relations at Warwick) to lead Development at Loughborough from January 2008.

ii)                   In order to allow the Vice-Chancellor to provide senior leadership and significant time commitment to this area, it was proposed that there would be a gradual adjustment of the Vice-Chancellor and Deputy Vice-Chancellor’s roles (involving a greater delegation of operational matters to the latter and a reduction in the involvement of the former in internal management activities). It was proposed also that the following expanded titles would be used, although only in appropriate contexts: Vice-Chancellor and President, Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor. There was no intention to change fundamental accountabilities in terms of the Charter and Statutes and HEFCE, nor to formalise the above titles in the Charter and Statutes.

iii)                 The University had participated in consultations regarding the government’s match-funding scheme. It was likely that under the scheme, £2M would be available to the University over a 3 year period (2008-11) if it was able to raise £4M above a “baseline” of existing performance.

 

07/83  Reorganisation of Committees

 

            SEN07-P73

Senate RESOLVED to approve a number of changes to the Committee Structure, relating to the abolition of Resources and Planning Committee, with effect from 1 January 2008.

 

The changes would lead to efficiencies (as debate would no longer be repeated at Resources and Planning Committee and Council), and to a greater degree of clarity and transparency (as reports from the former Sub-Committees of Resources and Planning Committee would be received directly by Senate and Council), without any reduction in the important contribution to debate provided by staff and student members. Decisions and recommendations relating to financial issues were to be devolved to Operations Sub-Committee and Performance Monitoring Group.

 

07/84  QAA Institutional Audit 2008

 

            SEN07-P74

The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching) provided an update on arrangements for the QAA Institutional Audit 2008, which would take place on 10-14 March 2008, following a briefing visit on 4-6 February 2008.

 

07/85  Monitoring of Research Student Progress

 

            SEN07-P75

Senate RECEIVED revised proposals from the Research Committee Regulations Review Group. Senate was satisfied that concerns expressed at its last meeting (in relation to the potential for the proposed Annual Report on Progress form to create a duplication of effort, and to the need to recognise legitimate diversity by subject in the way in which students were supervised) had been addressed, and it RESOLVED to approve the proposals, for implementation as soon as possible, from a specific date to be confirmed by the Group. In discussion, the following points were noted:

 

i)                    The proposals required that a minimum of 12 formal contacts between supervisor and student should normally take place per annum. However, this contact did not necessarily need to take the form of a face to face meeting, and it would be for departments to interpret this requirement in a manner appropriate to the discipline concerned, and to manage compliance accordingly.

ii)                   It was the responsibility of the supervisor, on behalf of the institution, rather than the student, to ensure that the 12 formal contacts took place and that they were recorded. This could be implemented locally by requiring the student to prepare a written record.

iii)                 It would be crucial for departments to ensure that an Annual Report on Progress form was completed for all active students so they were subsequently formally re-registered by the Research Student Office, and therefore included in the University’s HESES return.

iv)                 There was support for the notion of recording formal supervisory contact meetings and their outcomes on Co-tutor, but it was noted that it would be helpful in this context if the application was enhanced to allow documents to be uploaded.

ACTION: Secretary

 

07/86  Revision of Undergraduate Bursary Scheme and Access Agreement

 

            SEN07-P76

Senate RECEIVED proposed revisions to the Undergraduate Bursary Scheme and Access Agreement. Under the proposed new scheme there would be two rather than six income bands, and the proportion of additional fee income spent on bursaries would be approximately 17% (although the University had yet to explain to OFFA the rationale for reducing this proportion from 19% in the original Access Agreement). It was noted that:

 

i)                    No students would be worse-off as a result of the changes.

ii)                   No evidence had yet emerged from within the University, or from the sector generally, to suggest that bursary schemes were having any impact on student recruitment. However, the situation would continue to be monitored.

iii)                 The University could not discuss schemes directly with other institutions, but it was felt that many would make similar adjustments, and that some might raise their upper income threshold for the award of bursaries, possibly as high as £40K.

iv)                 The failure of some students to claim bursaries to which they were entitled had been a problem across the sector, but the University was working hard in this area, and it was hoped that improvements to the documentation issued by the Student Loans Company would help to improve the situation.

 

Senate RESOLVED to recommend the revisions to Council.

 

07/87  Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Enterprise)

                                               

            SEN07-P77

Senate RECEIVED a report from the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Enterprise) which highlighted a number of exciting activities. Of particular note was the University’s successful bid (as part of the Midlands Consortium, with Birmingham and Nottingham Universities) to host the Energies Technology Institute (ETI). It would be important for the University to be alert to all of the opportunities associated with hosting the Hub (relating to research across all faculties, the development of the campus, and publicity/marketing) and to carefully build and manage relationships with the ETI on a number of levels in order to achieve the optimum level of connectivity. Senate recorded its congratulations to those responsible for Loughborough’s contribution to the successful bid. Thanks were also given to ESRI and Cascaid, for their help and co-operation in vacating space in the Holywell building at short notice.

 

In discussion, it was noted that there were indications in the pre-budget and Sainsbury reports that increased funding was likely to be made available to Higher Education Institutions for enterprise-related activities, but there were some concerns about the likely metrics to be employed. It would be important, therefore, to ensure that the University was in a position to influence the national debate about how such activity was defined and measured for the purposes of allocating funding, and that it had in place appropriate mechanisms to record its activities in this area.

 

07/88  Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching)

 

            SEN07-P78

88.1          Student Recruitment

Senate RECEIVED a report on student recruitment, and offered its thanks to all Admissions Tutors for their hard work during August 2007. Targets had been exceeded in all areas other than UK/EU Taught Postgraduates (where there was a downward national trend), without lowering the quality of the intake. The above-target intake was expected to put pressure on certain parts of the University, and it would be important to ensure that it did not impact in a negative way on the student experience. A strategic review of student intakes and populations for the next 5 years was underway, including the impact of external pressures and opportunities for new developments. Close communications would be maintained with departments as the review progressed.

 

            SEN07-P79

88.2     National Student Survey 2007

Senate RECEIVED a report on the National Student Survey 2007. For the third year, the University had achieved a good result, and was ranked second only to Oxford, based on an average score across 21 questions. Thanks were offered to all involved, especially Loughborough Students’ Union and Marie Kennedy. It was noted that there was a degree of spin in the way NSS results were publicised by some institutions, and it was important that the University made the most of its genuinely excellent performance.

 

The Academic Registrar advised members that the University had recently signed up to a survey of all students (excluding those in the NSS 2008). It included questions on academic issues, and on support services, and it was hoped that it would generate a set of interesting data, including sector comparisons, that would complement that produced by the NSS.

 

07/89  Matters for Report by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research)

 

            SEN07-P80

89.1     Research Applications – Quarterly Analysis by Department

Senate NOTED a quarterly analysis of research applications by department. The University’s success-rate in terms of applying for external funding was already good, but there had been

420 unsuccessful applications in 2006-07, and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) was reviewing the extent to which performance in this area could be improved.

 

            SEN07-P81

89.2     New Research Grants and Contracts

Senate NOTED an analysis of new research grants and contracts. There had been a drop in the grand total achieved for 2006-07, as compared to the two previous years, and this was a cause for some concern. However, 2004-05 and 2005-06 had both seen very large specific awards that were heavily front-loaded and these served to distort the analysis to some extent.

 

89.3     RAE 2008

The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) presented a verbal update on RAE 2008 preparations, ahead of the submission deadline on Friday 30 November 2007, and thanked Heads of Department, research co-ordinators, and academics for their hard work. It was anticipated that the University would return 93-94% of all its teaching and research staff. This was likely to be towards the top end of the scale in comparison with other institutions, and served to underline Loughborough’s status as a research intensive University. Senate offered its thanks to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research), Angela Crawford, and all in the Research Office for their work in preparing for the RAE 2008. A consultation paper on future research assessment was to be issued shortly. Concern was growing about the likely reliance on metrics, and it was further noted that Professor Charles Oppenheim was serving on a committee advising on technical aspects.

 

89.4     Research Outputs

The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) presented a verbal report on research outputs, and referred specifically to two strong examples of ecologically directed research within IPTME: A new rubber formulation for green tyres, which reduced the use of rubber chemicals by up to 60-70%, developed by Dr Ali Ansarifar, and a hafnium-containing steel that would outlast its equivalents currently operating in power plants around the world by almost a factor of two, developed by Professor Roy Faulkner's research group.

 

89.5     Other Matters

The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) noted that the RAE 2008 process had highlighted a number of areas in which similar research was being carried out by different individuals and/or groups which appeared to be unaware that there were others within the institution with whom they might be in a position to collaborate. It was intended to invite such groups to meet in order to explore the potential for collaborative work.

 

07/90  Matters for Report by the Vice-Chancellor

                                               

            The Vice-Chancellor reported on the following matters:

 

i)                    Congratulations were offered to those involved in the successful bid to host the ETI Hub, and to all those in the Vehicle Safety Research Centre and the Driver Sleepiness Research Group responsible for securing the University’s sixth Queens’ Anniversary Prize (QAP) in recognition of its vehicle, road and driver safety research. Oxford was the only other University to have been awarded six QAPs.

ii)                   Professor Chris Backhouse had established an Internationalisation Advisory Group, and was working with Christina Zhang (LSU International Development Officer) on initiatives to enhance the international experience for all students, and seeking to identify institutions across the world with whom the University might wish to establish and develop mutually beneficial relationships.

iii)                 Following the end of Professor Tom Weyman-Jones tenure as Head of Department of Economics, ways in which the Business School and Department of Economics could work more closely together were being investigated, in line with Council’s strategy to evolve gradually towards the development of larger cost centres.

 

07/91  Programme Proposals

                                               

SEN07-P82

On the recommendation of Learning and Teaching Committee, on the advice of Curriculum Sub-Committee, Senate RESOLVED to recommend to Council as appropriate:

 

91.1     New programmes for introduction in the 2007-08 session

            FdEng Foundation Degree programme in Fundamentals of Powertrain Engineering

 

91.2     Award, title or major programme changes with effect from September 2007 entry (unless stated)

MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management (Higher Education Administration) to MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management and Leadership (Higher Education Administration)

MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management (NG Bailey) to MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management and Leadership (NG Bailey)

MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management (Thomas Cook) to MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management and Leadership (Thomas Cook)

MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management (Professional) to MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management and Leadership (Professional)

PGCert Management (British Printing Industries Federation) to PGCert Management and Leadership (Print and Packaging)

PGCert Management (Federation of Sports and Play Associates) to PGCert Management and Leadership (Federation of Sports and Play Associations)

BSc Retail Management to BSc Retailing, Marketing and Management (October 2009 entry)

 

91.3     Discontinuation of the following programmes (last intake shown in brackets)

            MSc Risk and Reliability Methods (October 2004)

            MSc, PGDip, PGCert Management (Professional) – (FKI) (2001-02)

 

07/92  Learning and Teaching Committee

                                               

On the recommendation of Learning and Teaching Committee Senate RESOLVED to approve:

 

            SEN07-P83

92.1     English Language Entry Requirements

Amendments to English language entry requirements for entry to postgraduate taught programmes.

 

            SEN07-P84

92.2     Widening Participation Strategy

            A revised widening participation strategy and supporting documentation.

 

            SEN07-P85

92.3     Assessment of Students       

Amendments to University assessment procedures as described in the Academic Quality Procedures Handbook.      

 

            SEN07-P86

92.4     Curriculum Sub-Committee

            Revised terms of reference.

 

            SEN07-P87

92.5     Procedures for Approval, Monitoring and Review of Collaborative Provision

Revised procedures, drawing together existing validation procedures and the code of practice for collaborative provision.

           

07/93  British University in Egypt

 

            SEN07-P88

Senate NOTED the action of the BUE Validation Sub-Committee on behalf of Senate in approving the validation of BUE degree programmes, and other developments.

           

07/94  Prizes Committee

                                               

On the recommendation of Prizes Committee, Senate RESOLVED to approve:   

 

SEN07-P89

94.1     The establishment of new prizes, amendments to prizes, and the discontinuation of prizes.

 

            SEN07-P90

94.2     Revised Terms of Reference of Prizes Committee.

 

07/95  Librarian’s Annual Report 2006-07

 

            SEN07-P91

This item was unstarred to note concerns about the extent to which Loughborough’s library provision lagged behind that of its 1994 Group counterparts. There was general agreement among members that the University’s library expenditure per student (which stood at 68% of the 1994 Group mean) was low for a university of Loughborough’s standing, and that this needed to be addressed. In terms of gross library spend, the University was ranked 86th in the sector as a whole, but this was due in part to the fact that Loughborough had a single library, and did not teach law or medicine. Some members reported that the issue of inadequate journal provision had been raised by candidates when recruiting at senior level, and in a different context, by some postgraduate students. It was noted further that a number of electronic resources were paid for directly by departments, rather than by the library.

 

In discussion, the following points were noted:

 

i)                    In order to match the 1994 Group mean, the University would need to spend an additional £1M per year on the library, and if this took the form of spending on books, additional shelf-space would be required.

ii)                   In deciding on any increase in resources allocated to the library, it would be important to give careful consideration to a number of issues, including the balance between electronic and hard-copy resources, the ways in which resources could be used most efficiently, the requirements of new subject areas, and the priorities identified in the University Strategy.

iii)         It was suggested that developing the library could form an initial project under the University’s Advancement initiative. It was noted, however, that library fundraising tended be difficult where money was sought for intangible materials (such as subscriptions to electronic journals) rather than hard-copy books.

 

The Deputy Vice-Chancellor noted that significant additional funding had recently been allocated to the library, as recorded in minute 07/32(i). However, Senate’s views on the importance of this issue were noted, and would be taken into consideration in the next budget round.

 

07/96  Membership of Senate 2007-08

 

            SEN07-P92

Senate NOTED the membership of Senate for 2007-08.     

 

07/97  Reports from Committees

                                               

Senate RECEIVED reports from the following Committees:

 

97.1     SEN07-P93     Learning and Teaching Committee of 8 November 2007.

97.2     SEN07-P94     Prizes Committee of 8 November 2007.

 

07/98  Dates of Future Meetings

 

            Wednesday 30 January 2008 (am)

            Wednesday 5 March 2008 (am)

            Wednesday 2 July 2008 (am)

 

Author: C Dunbobbin

Date: November 2007

Copyright © Loughborough University. All rights reserved.