Senate

 

Subject:        Use of Part C Modules in Part D of extended Undergraduate Programmes

Origin:           Unconfirmed Minutes of Learning and Teaching Committee on 3 June 2004

                                                                                                                                                                  

 

Curriculum Sub-Committee had asked for a decision from LTC on the weighting of C modules permissible in Part D, following consideration of proposals for new MPhys programmes in Physics and Mathematics and in Engineering Physics.  The Committee considered a recommendation from the PDQ Team that no more than 20 C-level credits should be permitted.  It was noted that Physics had already amended its new MPhys programme proposals to comply. 

 

It was RESOLVED to RECOMMEND to Senate accordingly.

 

It was noted that some other programmes might be out of step with the recommendation and agreed that departments should be given until the start of session 2005/06 to comply. 

 

                                                                                                                                                                

 

Author:  R A Bowyer

Date:  June 2004

Copyright © Loughborough University.  All rights reserved

 

 

Learning and Teaching Committee

Subject:      Use of Part C modules in Part D of extended undergraduate programmes

Origin                  PDQ Team

 

The Programme Development & Quality Team at its meeting on 24 May 2004 considered the use of Part C modules in Part D of extended undergraduate programmes.

CSC had asked for a decision from LTC on the weighting of C modules permissible in Part D of an extended undergraduate programme, following consideration of proposals for a new MPhys programme in Physics and Mathematics.  The proposed programme regulations would permit Part D students to undertake up to 40 credits of Part C modules.

 

PDQ was provided with relevant extracts from the FHEQ, the Credit Guidelines for HE Qualifications and the QAA Annex to Academic Standards – Engineering dealing with the attributes associated with an MEng.  It was the view there would be accreditation difficulties in allowing the use of C-level modules to the extent proposed if the programme in question were an MEng.  Although the accrediting body in this instance was the Institute of Physics, there should be consistency in the University’s approach across the undergraduate Masters programmes. 

 

It was recommended that no more than 20 C-level credits should be permitted in Part D of an extended undergraduate programme.

 

 

Note:

Recommendations from CSC concerning the introduction of a new MPhys programmes in Physics and Mathematics and in Engineering Physics are contained in LTC04-P30.  The above recommendation will impact on both programmes as well as on other existing programmes in both Engineering and Science. 

 

If LTC approves the recommendation, it will be asked to specify a date by which departments should comply.