The amendments detailed below are suggested as a reposnse to requests from academic departments seeking clarification on certain aspects of the original policy and in order to clarify the university procedures in this area for legislative purposes (i.e. in response to the Disability Discrimination Act (part 4)
Where
additional time is indicated in the student’s Educational Psychology
report 25% additional time is the standard allocation at Loughborough.
Exceptionally, more time, in addition to the 25%, may be recommended and
arranged for individuals. This should be discussed by the student with DANS and
then with the academic department. Students requiring extra time should
ordinarily sit their examinations in a separate room to the main body of
students. Where more than 25% additional
time is recommended for a student, the Department that the student is based in
will make the arrangements for the examination room. Students who have 25% additional time will
sit their examinations in the central extra-time venue.
It is
important that departments remember that where extra time is a recommendation
for students this should be allocated for class tests as well as more formal
examinations. Where possible the use of a separate room is recommended in these
circumstances.
Where the
recommendation is that students be permitted to use a scribe, a computer, or a
reader, the standard allocation of extra time should still apply. Students
identified as having a Specific Learning Difficulty should be permitted to use
coloured overlays in examinations where this is a recommendation in their
assessment of support needs.
The use of
sub-headings and bullet points should be permissible for all students, and this
fact should be brought to the attention of students. Where the ability to structure an essay or
report is part of the assessment, and thus the use of bullet points would not
be acceptable, this should be clearly detailed in the information given to
students when the work is set.
Students
who have been identified by DANS as having a Specific Learning Difficulty
should have the option of using a sticker, or some other way of identifying
themselves. It is accepted that such students would have to waive their right
to anonymity.
For
students who have Specific Learning Difficulty , spelling and grammar that does
not affect the clarity of the writing should not be penalised. Departments should consider how this can be
achieved within their marking scheme and submit a suitable proposal to the
University Examinations Office for approval.
A suggested scheme is detailed below:
Departments
should specify the maximum that any student should lose for poor
spelling and grammar that does not affect the clarity of the writing – 5%
is a possible figure. Students who have
dyslexia should have their work marked out of 95% (i.e. 100 minus the figure
chosen by the department) and then their mark should be scaled up to produce a
mark out of 100%.
(Where
students have used a scribe in the examination, allowances for poor spelling
and grammar should not apply.)
Spelling
and grammar that does affect the clarity of the writing should be treated in
the same way for all students.
All
students should meet the specified deadlines.
However, exceptionally, the academic department may allow an extension
to a deadline. This should be done in
conjunction with DANS and approved by the Head of the Academic Department
concerned.
Early
identification of students who are experiencing difficulties that may be
dyslexia-related is desirable and academic departments should endeavour to
refer students to DANS/ELSU at the earliest opportunity. All students should be made aware of the
demands of work required in subsequent years of the programme (e.g.
dissertation, final year project) so that any student who has difficulty with
the written/organisational element of their studies has ample time to seek
support.
Due to
difficulties with short term memory, students who have a Specific Learning
Difficulty may become reliant on using a particular calculator that they are
familiar with, and may find it difficult to adapt to using a different
calculator at short notice. It is
helpful, therefore, for departments that stipulate the use of particular models of calculator, to inform students of this as early as possible, preferably in the pre-course information sent to students. Changes of specified equipment at short notice should be avoided.
BSL users
People who
are prelingually deaf will not acquire language at the same rate, or in the
same way, as a non-deaf person, and will often have difficulties in the use of
spoken and written language into adulthood. It will therefore be appropriate
for exam questions to be re-written by a qualified teacher of the deaf (or
similar) and for the student to be given both altered and unaltered papers to
use in the exam.
For both
coursework and exams such students should be treated the same as students with
dyslexia in relation to poor spelling and grammar that does not affect the
clarity of the writing. Students should,
therefore, use a sticker on their work, as outlined above.