Learning and Teaching Committee

 

Subject:        Schemes for allowing Programme Boards to move students out of rank order as defined by their programme mark

 

Origin:           Programme Development and Quality Team

 

 

There has been debate for some time about the level of discretion available to Programme Boards.  Some departments, and some External Examiners, have expressed a sense of being unduly constrained by current regulations. 

 

Such discussion led to the decision, implemented from the current session, to permit undergraduate Programme Boards under certain conditions to condone marks which do not meet the normal requirements for progression or for an award to be made (ARUA 2004, para 9).

 

There remains a perception on the part of some however that the problem lies in being unable to take final year students out of rank order (as defined by their programme mark) unless a viva voce examination has taken place.  A few departments have therefore continued to pursue a possible revision of current Programme Board procedures to address this issue.  Mechanisms such as a ‘majority of papers rule’ have been suggested, which would allow Programme Boards to exercise academic judgement about the degree classification of individual candidates whose profile of module marks fulfils certain criteria suggesting they might merit a higher classification than indicated solely by the programme mark. 

 

The three AD(T)s recently consulted departmental teaching co-ordinators or their Directorates on the question whether there should be any change in existing procedures to allow Programme Boards such scope for moving students out of rank order.  They reported back to the PDQ Team that they found no support for such a proposal from either Engineering or Science, and views amongst SSH departments were mixed, some departments being happy with the existing system whilst three or four would like to see some change. 

 

This raised the question whether the small minority of departments which wanted it should be allowed to adopt a different scheme within their own programme regulations.  PDQ felt this would be a retrograde step and lead to difficulties in the case of joint degrees.

 

In the light of the views expressed, PDQ RECOMMENDS to LTC that the current degree classification rules should continue to apply across the institution.