Learning and Teaching Committee is invited to note the following items from the meeting of Curriculum Sub-Committee held on 18 October 2007.
.1 It was noted that all recommendations
to Learning and Teaching Committee, and subsequently to Senate where
appropriate, had been approved, and the relevant minute of Senate was noted.
.2 Minute 07/12 – External Input
to Programme Approval
(a) The revised new programme proposal form and guidance were
noted.
(b) The following statement in the Code of
Practice for External Examining for Taught Undergraduate and Postgraduate
Programmes was noted:
External Examiners may be asked from
time to time to comment on new programme developments. The University’s approval procedure
requires departments to obtain an external view which may be from within the HE
sector or from an industry/employer perspective.
.3 Minute 07/13 – MA English: New
Programme Proposal
(a) The revised Curriculum
Map, included in CSC07-P27 above, was noted.
(b) It was noted that the
Sub-Committee’s request that all assessment contributing to a module mark
should be summative and not formative had been withdrawn.
.4 Minute 07/15.2 – Changes to
Programme Titles
It was noted that the following
title change had been agreed by Chair’s action with immediate effect:
PGCert Mathematics Support for Students
with Dyslexia and Dyscalculia in HE/FE
to
PGCert Mathematics Support and Dyslexia/Dyscalculia in HE/FE.
.5 Minute 07/20.1 – Annual Update
of Module Specifications and Programme
Regulations/ Specifications
It was noted that Departmental
Administrators had been expressing concern over the volume of work related to
this and other activities over the summer period, particularly in relation to
the requirement to revise the programme structure section of Programme
Specifications. Further information
would come forward to the next meeting for discussion.
The Sub-Committee noted its
membership for 2007-08, and the Chair’s action in approving the addition
of the Head of Academic Practice and Enhancement, Professional Development, as
a member.
The Sub-Committee considered
proposals from the
The Sub-Committee acknowledged
the University’s requirement that students opting for an alternative
qualification should relinquish their original award to avoid ‘double
counting’, but felt this to be a grey area in terms of how this was
achieved for students returning to the University after some time, or bringing
their award from another institution. It was nevertheless clear that students
could not be required to relinquish their original award until their subsequent
award had been confirmed.
It was AGREED that the
proposers be asked to resubmit the proposals, making a more convincing case as
to the basis of the credit exemption and whether this was based on specific
ILOs or more general prior learning.
Author
– Jennie Elliott
Date
– May 2007
Copyright
© Loughborough University. All rights
reserved