Subject: Revalidation of programmes at
Origin: PVC(T),
AD(T) SSH, PDQ Team Manager
The initial period of
validation by the University of the following Foundation degree programmes at
University validation
procedures require that before an agreement is renewed, a review should be
undertaken, covering the same institutional and programme-specific issues as an
initial validation event, and by a panel with the same constitution as for an
initial validation. The procedures also
allow for these requirements to be reduced in the light of any recent periodic
programme review (PPR), the requirements for which overlap substantially with
those specified for a revalidation.
Arrangements were put in hand
at the start of this session for a PPR of the College programmes in the Sport,
Exercise and Fitness area, with the exception of the FD in Exercise and Health
which had its first intake only this session.
The PPR encompassed the two FDs in SS and SSwSM, plus the one-year BSc
Honours ‘top-up’ in Applied Sports Science and associated bridging
arrangements which are currently validated until 2007.
The report of the PPR appears
elsewhere on this LTC agenda. Several
issues were identified for attention by the College, but overall the quality
and standards of the programmes were found to be satisfactory and several features
were considered examples of innovation and good practice.
The College has submitted an
initial response to the PPR Report, which is also included with the agenda
papers for this meeting.
The PPR Report and the
College response have been discussed between the PVC(T), the AD(T) of SSH and
the PDQ Team Manager as ex officio validation panel members, who wish to recommend to LTC and Senate that the
validation of the two FDs in SS and SSwSM be extended for a further period to
31 July 2011 and that the validation of the BSc Honours programme in Applied
Sports Science also be extended at this point to the same date.
This recommendation is made
on the understanding that the actions being taken by the College to address the
issues identified in the PPR Report will be further monitored through the APR
process.
The College has also been
alerted to the fact that the University Validation Working Group has requested
a review of several specific QA procedures in the context of validated
provision, namely impaired performance claims, late submission of coursework,
academic misconduct, student appeals against assessment board decisions, and
student complaints. The review may
result in changes at the operational level in the validation arrangements
between the two institutions.
The Committee is asked to
note that the University has engaged with
The Committee is also
reminded that the QAA Reviewers in their review of the FD in SSwSM last session
expressed ‘confidence in the standards and achievements of students and
in the quality of learning opportunities’.