Learning
and Teaching Committee
Subject: Use of HEFCE e-learning capital funding
Origin: Secretary
______________________________________________________________
At the
previous meeting, the Committee received a report on discussions between the
PDQ Team and the DISS Service Directors on possible uses of HEFCE e-learning
capital funding. Following further
discussions, recommendations were submitted to Operations Sub-Committee and
approved by the sub-committee as detailed below:
The
recommendations were in two parts.
(1) Initiatives
proposed by the DISS Service Directors
Library |
|
Further
development of the open learning area |
|
Development of the network infrastructure |
16400 |
|
|
Enhancement of the Open3 learning space |
11100 |
|
|
Online
tutorials for information literacy |
3800 |
|
|
Networked
backup for the Loughborough Institutional Repository |
2500 |
|
|
Improved
support for e-learning in group study rooms |
2500 |
|
|
Computing Services |
|
Further
rollout of wireless networking |
100000 |
|
|
Media Services |
|
Portable
videoconferencing system |
15000 |
|
|
TOTAL |
151300 |
Notes:
(i)
Library: Extension of cabled networking into all individual study
carrels and group study rooms, and development of a wireless service throughout
level 3 of the Library and around the perimeters of levels 1 and 2; enhancement
of Open3 space to increase flexibility in supporting group and individual
learning; software to support online demonstrations of electronic information
services and tutorials in their use; provision of a networked backup solution
for learning objects and research output on the institutional repository;
installation of data projection facilities in one group study room currently
without them.
(ii)
Computing Services:
SRIF funding has already been obtained to provide wired and wireless
networking within the
The extension of wireless networking envisaged here would
constitute a third phase. It would be
targeted at meeting rooms and other shared spaces used for teaching and
learning and less formal gatherings of staff and students. Computing Services will take advice from its
‘Mobile IT Advisory Group’ and discuss with PDQ the most effective
use of the sum budgeted. A key decision
will be the number of buildings to be given wireless coverage, as this affects
the scale of fixed infrastructural costs relative to the number of access
points. If all University buildings are
to have wireless potential, the fixed costs will be £50k; there would then be
sufficient budget to install approximately 85 access points, permitting, for
example, the wireless networking of some 50 meeting rooms which are available
for booking, together with a further 35 access nodes in other spaces where
students work singly or in groups.
(iii)
Media Services: The Director of Media Services provided a report on the provision
and use of videoconferencing facilities on the campus. This is currently very limited and does not
support a strong case for significant expenditure. However, the purchase of a
portable videoconferencing system for experimentation for use in the James
France and
PDQ also recommended that the e-learning funding be used to
reimburse central funds for the cost of Physics’ videoconferencing link
to
(2) Development of
core services
PDQ recommended
that the bulk of the remaining funding be earmarked (a) for the development of
‘Learn’, the University’s VLE, and (b) for upgrading the
Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) software, Questionmark Perception, to the
next version. The residual sum would be
held back for contingencies and/or other possible applications, until the costs
of these developments have been finalised.
Development
of the VLE to draw on open source materials |
80000 |
|
|
Upgrade
of CAA to QMP Version 4 |
20000 |
|
|
Physics
– reimbursement of funds provided for videoconferencing link to |
10000 |
|
|
Other
work/Contingency |
31800 |
|
|
TOTAL |
141800 |
Notes:
(i) Future
of ‘Learn’ as the University’s VLE
The HEFCE announcement of the funding allocation for
e-learning has coincided with discussions on the possible replacement of
‘Learn’ as the University’s VLE. This is discussed elsewhere on the current
LTC agenda.
(ii) CAA
Version 4 of ‘Questionmark Perception’ has now
been released. Version 3 will receive no
further development by the vendors and the product will become
‘desupported’ in May 2007. The
upgrade will require significant University input, the capacity to provide
which has not yet been identified. PDQ
has recommended that a sum of £20k be set aside to move ahead with the upgrade
when a satisfactory solution is found.