This is a discussion document
and does not represent
University
policy at this stage.
The Semesterisation Review Group has considered the many constructive comments
made by members of the University in regard to the current structure of the
semesterised academic year, and has sought to identify possible modifications
to that structure which might alleviate most of the concerns raised.
Two basic assumptions have been made:-
- (i)
- That the Undergraduate Academic Year will continue to be of thirty weeks'
duration;
- (ii)
- That Undergraduate Programmes will continue to be modular, with teaching
and learning in blocks of twelve weeks' duration.
Within those parameters
there are two major issues to be addressed:-
- (i)
- The pattern of the thirty week Undergraduate Academic Year;
- (ii)
- The mapping of the Academic Year onto the Calendar.
Three principal models within which modular programmes are conducted in the UK
are outlined below. The distribution of teaching and learning (T) and
assessment (A) is also given for each model.
PATTERN 1 2 x 15 week semesters
12 weeks T + 3 weeks A; 12 weeks T + 3 weeks A
PATTERN 2 1 x 14 week semester; 1 x 16 week semester (or 13 + 17)
12 weeks T + 2 weeks A; 12 weeks T + 4 weeks A
(12 + 1; 12 + 5)
PATTERN 3 12 weeks' teaching and learning (First Semester modules) + 12
weeks' teaching and learning (Second Semester modules) + 6
weeks' assessment
There is no consistent mapping of any of the three patterns of Academic Year
outlined above onto the Calendar. All three can be mapped onto a traditional 3
x 10 week term structure. Similarly all can be mapped onto three terms of
asymmetric length , or can themselves form the basis of two semesters for
attendance purposes. The University currently uses Pattern 1 mapped onto
residential terms of 11 weeks (Autumn), 11 weeks (Spring) and 8 weeks (Summer).
A primary issue to be addressed is that of whether assessment should
necessarily continue to precede the next teaching period. If this were felt
still to be a pedagogical imperative, Pattern 3 above would fall.
In discussing this issue the Group noted a number of concerns related to the
current pattern:
- (i)
- That the impact on academic staff of two examination periods in the
Academic Year was said to be deleterious, and to have an adverse effect on
research output;
- (ii)
- That the intervention of the Christmas vacation between Semester One
teaching and assessment periods was undesirable;
- (iii)
- That the lack of any break between semesters imposed an additional burden
on staff in terms of marking examinations in an unreasonably short timescale
and prevented students from receiving feedback prior to the beginning of
Semester Two;
- (iv)
- That the week immediately following the Christmas vacation and preceding
the assessment period was used inconsistently, leading to variable attendance
by students.
The Group acknowledges all the concerns outlined above, and
its proposals at Paragraph 5 below seek to address them. Nonetheless the
Group, strongly supported by the Students' Union representative, generally
feels that modularisation can only work satisfactorily if assessment takes
place immediately after the delivery of the module. The Group reaffirms the
importance of students getting feedback through formative assessment during the
course of the Academic Year. It is essential that there should be a formal
mechanism to evaluate whether or not students have achieved the learning
objectives stated in module specifications, and this is made much more
difficult by deferring assessment.
The adoption of two fifteen-week Semesters with a break at Christmas would
entail starting the Academic Year on the first or second Monday in September.
The time available to complete the admissions process following the publication
of `A' level results would be less than three working weeks, and the
recruitment of students through clearing, the admission of international
students, as well as the organisation of resits and subsequent arrangements for
the readmission of successful resit students, could all suffer. Furthermore,
the consequent pressures on staff and students are felt to be unacceptable.
The Group considered the case for a staggered start, with freshers arriving one
or two weeks into the first fifteen week semester, but felt that the social and
financial implications for Halls of Residence were such that the idea should be
rejected.
Accordingly the Group feels that two equal length Semesters with an
inter-semester break at Christmas cannot be achieved in the foreseeable future.
In order to meet the concerns identified above, viz:-
- Reduction of pressure of assessment on academic staff;
- Assessment taking place before the next teaching and learning period;
- Assessment immediately following teaching and learning;
- An inter-semester break to allow time for marking and feedback;
- Sufficient time to admit students through clearing, and to process resits;
- A common start date to the Academic Year
it is recommended that the University adopt a version of Pattern 2 above with
two asymmetric semesters, the first of fourteen weeks' duration, and the second
of sixteen weeks' duration, with the first Semester being completed before
Christmas; furthermore in order to reduce the burden of assessment on academic
staff, current policy that formal written examinations at the end of Semester
One be kept to a minimum should be reaffirmed and all Module and Programme
Boards should be held towards the end of Semester Two. Provisional grades
awarded in Semester One Assessments should be made known to students by Module
Organisers on an informal basis by a given date at the start of Semester Two.
The holding of Module Boards at the end of Semester One and the subsequent
formal publication of results is not essential provided that proper feedback is
made available to students.
The Group has taken advice from the Director of the Residential Organisation,
the Senior Assistant Registrar (Student Office) and from Wardens about bringing
forward the start of the Academic Year. Any move to introduce a 14 week
pre-Christmas semester in the Academic Year in 1997 would necessitate either
cancelling a major 1,500-bed conference booking over the weekend 19-21
September, in which case the consequent loss of income and goodwill would have
an adverse effect on the Residential Organisation's financial position
necessitating an increase in hall fees, or engaging a substantial army of
cleaners to ensure rooms were available to students within a few hours of that
conference ending. The professional opinion of the Director of the Residential
Organisation is that this would be extremely difficult. Hence any move to
introduce a 14 week pre-Christmas semester should preferably be made in
1998/99, giving the Organisation more time to adjust its conference marketing
strategy, and also allowing planning for Summer 1997 examinations and
reexaminations to continue in accordance with the current timetable. However a
twelve week Autumn Term and a longer Christmas Vacation could be introduced in
1997/98, thereby alleviating some of the concerns of members of the
University.
Under these proposals the structure of the Academic Year for 1997/98 and
1998/99 could be as follows:-
1997/98
SEMESTER ONE: 12 weeks' teaching and learning 29 September - 19 December
[4 WEEK CHRISTMAS VACATION]
3 weeks' assessment 19 January - 6 February
SEMESTER TWO: 7 weeks' teaching and learning 9 February - 27 March
[3 WEEK EASTER VACATION]
5 weeks' teaching and learning 20 April - 22 May
3 weeks' assessment 25 May - 12 June
The start and finish dates of the Academic Year would remain unchanged from
those currently published.
1998/99
SEMESTER ONE: 12 weeks' teaching and learning 14 September - 4 December
2 weeks' assessment 7 December - 18 December
[4 WEEK CHRISTMAS VACATION]
SEMESTER TWO: 12 weeks' teaching and learning 18 January - 26 March
[3 WEEK EASTER VACATION]
and 19 April - 30 April
4 weeks' assessment 3 May - 28 May
Ideally all Programme and Module Boards would take place by the end of Semester
Two, thereby enabling viva voce examinations to be held whilst students were
still in residence.
Senate is invited to approve the Review Group's recommendations outlined above,
and to invite Teaching and Learning Committee to bring forward detailed
proposals, including a calendar for subsequent years, to its next meeting.
[Agenda]
Author - David Wolfe
Date - 13 November 1996
Copyright (c) Loughborough University. All rights reserved.