Faculty of Engineering
Faculty
Board
ENG04-M3
<P><hr>
Minutes of the 40th meeting of the Faculty Board
held on 27 October 2004.
Members: Professor
C J Backhouse (Chair), Mr C J Bigger, Dr P M Carrillo, Dr A R J Dainty (ab), Dr
S Datta, Mr J G Dickens, Professor P Dickens, Dr A El-Hamalawi, Mr O R Folkerd,
Dr K Gregory, Dr J L Horner, Professor M G Kong (ab), Dr L R Mustoe (ab), Dr S
T Newman (ab), Dr G J Page, Professor C D Rielly, Professor S J Rothberg (ab),
Mrs C E Siemieniuch, Professor V V Silberschmidt, Professor P R Smith (ab), Dr
I K Smout (ab), Dr A Spencer, Dr E S Tarleton, Ms M E Thomas (ab), Professor A
Thorpe (ab), Professor R H Thring, Professor R J Wakeman (ab), Professor D J
Wallace (ab), Dr P Willmot, Professor M A Woodhead (ab)
Apologies for absence: Dr A R J Dainty, Professor M G Kong, Dr L R Mustoe, Dr S T
Newman, Professor S J Rothberg, Professor P R Smith, Mr I K Smout and Professor
R J Wakeman
The Dean welcomed new members to the meeting, and thanked
retired members for their service.
22. Minutes
ENG04-M2
The
Minutes of the 39th meeting of the Board were confirmed and signed by
the Chair.
23. Dean’s report
.1 The
Committee on Structure of the Academic Year had provided an
alternative of finishing the
academic year one week earlier or later;
the Board
accepted the Directorate’s model
to finish one week later. The incoming
Vice
Chancellor may also wish to
express a view on the deliberations.
.2 The
Strategic Working Group (formerly the Moderation Working Party) had
recommended:
i.
Establishment of virtual research schools, to co-ordinate
current ad hoc collaboration between departments, and promote a critical mass
in key research areas. Some issues
remain to be resolved concerning responsibilities of heads of research schools
vis a vis heads of academic departments.
ii.
Establishment of a University-wide graduate school, to
include improved support for PG and international students.
iii.
Abolition of Faculty Boards. Joint meetings might be held with Directorate, using closed sessions
where necessary, or Directorate minutes might be published.
iv.
No changes were at present proposed regarding departmental
membership of faculties.
v.
Schools incorporating 2-3 departments would only be
established where there would be clear operational benefit.
These proposals had yet to be
approved by Senate and Council. There
should be no effect on the RAE.
.3 The maximum
possible tuition fees would be introduced from 2006, if the
University’s proposed Access
Agreement was approved by the Office for Fair
Access (OFFA). To be accepted, the Agreement must include a
significant
number of means-tested bursaries
worth £1,200-£1,500. Departments would
be able to offer scholarships,
costs to be borne by the department.
.4 The
University would be represented on the Stirling Group tour to Singapore
and Malaysia in March by Professor
Thring.
.5 300,000
Z-cards had been distributed (individually) to students taking GCSE
Mathematics in UK schools, a
proven means of raising Loughborough’s
Profile.
.6 Congratulations
were offered to Professor Rothberg and Professor Kong on
their personal chairs.
Tabled
paper
.1 The
University was likely to withdraw from the New Route PhD, which
involved few departments, and recruited
very few students. However, the
training element made it an
attractive route for some international students and their sponsors, especially
those from some Middle Eastern countries, and it was not clear that the
University had really promoted it. The
Board was not convinced that the New Route PhD should be abolished, and
believed that further thought should be given to its benefits. The Department of Chemical Engineering was
willing to champion a replacement if funding were available.
.2 Additional
HEFCE funding had been made available for Rewarding and
Developing (academic) Staff, with
the probability of a similar amount being
available next year.
.3 EPSRC
funding enabled recruitment across the Faculty of six enhanced
studentships, effectively worth
£20,000 each, with similar monies in the
following academic year. UK/EU students would be recruited through
national advertising, with current
Loughborough finalists equally eligible.
Tabled
paper
.1 Undergraduate
recruitment data showed that both University and Faculty
were largely on target, the latter
partly by concessions and changed course
offers. The home intake was buoyant and stable. Overshoots in some SSH
departments meant that approximately
400 students were being taught on a
fees-only basis. The University was therefore seeking to
reduce its 2005-06
target.
The number of international
applications had been very high but actual entry
static. The number of no-shows were likely to be affected by (a) most
competitors accepting lower
standards of English language qualification, (b)
Singapore becoming a regional
provider, (c) Malaysian students now needing
visas. Australia and USA intakes had declined more than the UK. In the
longer term, the Faculty did not
seek to increase its overall undergraduate
international target significantly
except for certain departments that currently
had few international
undergraduates.
The Faculty’s full-time UK/EU
taught postgraduate intake had been static at
approximately 70 for the last few
years and was therefore on target. The
international full-time PGT had
risen significantly in recent years in
applications, acceptances and
intake, but there had also been a large number
of no-shows this year. Engineering had been particularly affected
by no-
shows from Pakistan, Nigeria and
Ghana, where students were using their
visas to obtain work. Visa problems for Chinese students had not
affected
the University. The market was volatile and caution should
be exercised
about over-reliance. It was difficult to obtain and interpret
data on part-time
PGTs.
Engineering applications for 2005
entry were higher than usual at this time of
Year, probably because of a rise
in on-line applications.
.2 Departments
had been briefed about the new National Student Survey (NSS)
which would take place in February
2005, involving all undergraduate
finalists. Results would inevitably feed into national
league tables of
universities, and staff were encouraged
to continue best practice such as
returning coursework on time and
with appropriate feedback, and to meet with
their personal tutees. Most
Loughborough students were positive about their
experiences here, and it was hoped
there would be a high response rate.
.3 The report
of the Institutional Audit was largely positive, and its
recommendations would be taken up
by PDQ as appropriate.
26. Cranwell accreditation report
ENG04-P8
The
programme was run by the RAF for its officers, who had complained of a
heavy workload caused by having to
meet both University and RAF criteria.
The quality of students was high.
27. Award of research degrees
ENG04-P9
Degrees
were awarded as follows:
Doctor of
Philosophy
Z A Abdul Karim (Aeronautical and
Automotive Engineering)
X T Deng (Electronic and
Electrical Engineering)
A M Thomson “ “ “ “
S S Dani (Mechanical and
Manufacturing Engineering)
A G Gunendran “ “ “
A Jhugroo “ “ “
F M Y Othman “ “ “
It had been gratifying to see a
high number awarded at summer graduation
ceremonies.
28. Actions of the Associate Dean
(Teaching)
ENG04-P10
It was RESOLVED to ratify the
actions taken by the AD(T).
29. Staff Student Committees
The Board
noted the deposition of minutes listed on the Agenda.
30. Membership 2004/05
ENGO4-P11
Noted.
31. Constitution and powers
ENGO4-P12
Noted.
32. Representation on other bodies
ENG04-P13
Noted.
33. Degree congregation
Noted.
34. Calendar of meetings
Noted.
35. Any other business
.1 There would
be a fly-past by a Eurofighter on 28 October to coincide with the
signing by the Vice Chancellor of
an agreement with the Defence Technical
Undergraduate Scheme (DTUS).
.2 Dr
El-Hamalawi agreed to represent the Faculty on the Ethical Advisory
Committee.