Proposal for a New Programme
This form is
available for downloading from admin/ar/templates/new_prog - spaces can be
expanded as required.
This
proposal is in Strategic Phase
Operational Phase
1. Name
of Department and Departmental contact
Information Science Heather Rees/Anne Morris |
2. Award
and Title of proposed new programme
BA/BSc: Information Science |
3. Month
and Year of first intake to the programme
October 2004 Will
the programme be offered as: ό full-time part-time full-time
and part-time |
4. If
the proposed new programme is a revised version of an existing programme,
state how this will be phased in, i.e. - year(s) that Parts B, C, D will
commence; pathway for students currently on placement/leave of absence and
resit students This
is a revised version of the existing Bachelor of Library Studies (BLS)
programme, which is a one-year programme available only to students who have
obtained a two-year diploma. There is
no need for a phased introduction of the proposed new programme; any
reassessment students or students on leave of absence would continue either
with the same modules or with alternatives from the revised lists. |
5. List
the numbers of any new modules proposed. ISC331
Strategic Planning and Marketing (new optional module, compulsory for another
departmental programme) ISB022 Publishing Production (new optional
module, currently available to other departmental programmes) ISB303
Database Design (new optional module, currently available to other
departmental programmes) |
6. Is
it intended that any modules will be available by full/partial Distance
Learning? Yes ό No Is it intended that the programme will
be fully Distance Learning? Yes ό No Guidelines on full/partial DL
provision are available on the intranet at: https://internal.lboro.ac.uk/admin/registry/uniwide/ |
7. Reasons
for the proposal: its purpose and relevance; how it will enhance calibre of
teaching and learning; implications for existing programmes and modules in
the department The
new title better reflects the content of the programme, and the fact that the
library studies element is less prevalent.
The
former BLS programme included two 10-credit compulsory modules on English
Language and Study Skills and a 20-credit Dissertation module. This new programme provides for the two
10-credit modules to be incorporated into a 30-credit Dissertation module, thus
allowing appropriate skills tuition to the international students who
comprise the programme and bringing the module weighting in line with the
Project module in other departmental programmes. The language and writing skills element of the Dissertation
module will be assessed. There are no implications for other programmes or
modules. |
8. Expected student numbers Four or five. |
9. Staffing implications - adequacy of
existing departmental resources; net increase/reduction in staff teaching
effort or demands on support staff No implications. |
10. Additional
Library requirements None. |
11. Additional
Computing Support required None. |
12. Other
resource implications, e.g. - lecture room, lab and other space requirements;
equipment, materials; timetabling constraints (block-teaching for example);
any special residential requirements None. |
13. Implications
for other departments both providing and receiving None. The ELSU will provide teaching on the
skills element of the Dissertation module, as was the case with the former
10-credit English Language and Study Skills modules. |
14. Evidence
of demand and suitability; views of lecturers; current/prospective students;
external examiners/ assessors, professional/industrial bodies etc. |
15. Implications
for employability |
16. Any
other relevant information Although this is a strategic proposal, due to the change of programme title, the amendments to the content are minimal. |
STRATEGIC
PHASE
Financial Statement attached
Head of Department Signature: .
Date: ..
Comments
from Associate Dean (Teaching):
This proposal has been discussed with the Department and can now be submitted to the Faculty Directorate and Operations Sub-Committee.
Yes/No
Associate Dean (Teaching) Signature: ..
Date:
Forms not including both the Head of
Department's and Associate Dean (Teaching)'s signature will not be accepted.
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Programme Regulations attached (with any Distance Learning Modules identified) Yes
Programme Specification attached Yes
New Module Specifications (CIS versions) attached Yes
(to
include for each a completed proposal form for new modules as used for
the
Annual Update process, excluding the Approval Route page for signatures)
Evidence of External Support attached No
Consultation forms attached and considered:
........... Other Academic Departments None
........... (Please
list)
........... Library
No
........... Careers Service
No
........... Computing
Services
No
...........
........... Media Services
No
........... Learning
and Teaching Development (where appropriate for the development,
........... support
and provision of distance learning) N/a
Quality
Assurance Statement attached (for collaborative proposal only) N/a
Head of Department Signature: .
Date: ..
Comments from the Associate Dean (Teaching):
This proposal can now be submitted to Curriculum Sub-Committee
Associate Dean (Teaching) Signature: ..
Date:
Forms not including both the Head of
Department's and Associate Dean (Teaching)'s signature will not be accepted.
(June 2003)
WHEN SUBMITTING
OPERATIONAL PROPOSALS please forward an electronic copy of the proposal form
and the programme regulations/specification as an email attachment to
J.E.Elliott
APPROVAL OF NEW PROGRAMMES
(This page is for
information and should not be copied into the approval process)
Approval
for new programmes is in two phases.
In
the strategic phase an outline
proposal is scrutinised by the Faculty Directorate and by the Operations
Sub-Committee (normally in that order).
In
the operational phase a revised and
more detailed proposal is scrutinised by Faculty Board members and by
Curriculum Sub-Committee and a
recommendation made to Learning and Teaching Committee.
New
programmes may not be publicised and UCAS listing cannot be permitted until LTC
has given permission. Final approval
is given by Council upon the recommendation of Senate. Please refer to the Academic Quality
Procedures Handbook for a fuller description of the process.
The Strategic
Phase
1. Complete the proposal form in consultation with the
Associate Dean (Teaching).
2. Complete a New Course Costing Form available from Steve
Shipton in the Finance Office.
3. Send copies of both forms to the Associate Dean (Teaching)
who will pass them on to Jennie Elliott (Secretary to Curriculum
Sub-Committee).
Keep a copy of the proposal form on disk since it
may be necessary to modify it in the light of comments made.
In
the strategic phase the proposal is examined by Operations Sub-Committee in the
light of comments made by the Directorate.
Departments will receive feedback as quickly as possible after the OSC
meeting.
While
in the strategic phase, prepare for the
operational phase:
1. Send copies of the consultation form (which follows in these
documents) to the various academic and service departments so that they may
comment upon your proposal.
2. Set up specifications on CIS
for new modules associated with the proposed programme - Jennie Elliott will
assist with this. Distance
Learning/partial DL* modules should be identified on the CIS database.
3. Draft the programme regulations and
programme specification, identifying Distance Learning/ partial DL* modules.
4. Invite at least one external senior
academic to write a letter in support of the proposal.
* Guidelines on DL/partial DL provision are available on the intranet at: https://internal.lboro.ac.uk/admin/registry/uniwide/.
The
Operational Phase
1. Change the proposal form in the light
of comments made in the strategic phase.
2. Send the full proposal to the Associate Dean (Teaching), to
pass on to Jennie Elliott. The full
proposal will consist of the modified proposal form, the draft programme
regulations and programme specification, proposed new module specifications
(which must be CIS versions) together
with a completed New Module proposal form for each, consultation forms and
external documents of support.
3. Members of the Faculty Board will be sent the proposal and
invited to make comments to their representative on Curriculum Sub-Committee.
4. CSC will then take those comments into account when
deliberating the proposal. The member
of staff sponsoring the new programme proposal may be asked to attend CSC in
order to assist members with points of detail.
Collaborative Proposals
All collaborative
arrangements between the University and other institutions or organisations
involving the provision of programmes or modules of study and the granting of
awards and qualifications of the University, including credit, should be
negotiated and approved in accordance with the University's Code of Practice
for Collaborative Provision.
Once
it has been agreed that a collaborative proposal should be pursued,
documentation must be routed for approval in accordance with the two-phase
procedure described above, using the standard pro forma. In the Strategic Phase, the programme
costing form must provide detail of the proposed financial arrangements with
the partner institution/organisation in respect of the collaboration. In the Operational Phase, the proposal must
incorporate a Quality Assurance
Statement using the standard pro forma.
Further
Information
Please
refer to item A of Programme Proposals via the Academic Registry alphabetical
list at http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/az.htm
for a calendar of critical committee dates.
Heads
of Departments, Chairs of Departmental Teaching Committees and Departmental
Administrators have copies of the Academic Quality Procedures Handbook.
It is also available at http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/policy/aqp/index.htm
Contacts:
The Associate Deans
(Teaching):
Engineering
Mr John Dickens, Civil & Building Engineering j.g.dickens@lboro 2614
Science
Dr David Green, Mathematical Sciences: d.r.green@lboro 2864
Social Science and
Humanities
Mr Peter Maunder, Economics: w.p.maunder@lboro 2706
Mr Steve Shipton, Management Accountant: s.c.shipton@lboro 2013
Dr Jennie Elliott, Assistant
Registrar: j.e.elliott@lboro 2236
[June
2003]
LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY
LEARNING AND TEACHING COMMITTEE
CURRICULUM SUB-COMMITTEE
A proposal for a new programme
Senate requires that strategic proposals for new programmes include evidence of adequate consultation within the University.
Consultation is required with:
Academic departments which will provide teaching to the programme
Academic departments which have relevant expertise or common interests
The Pilkington Library
The Careers Service
Media Services
Computing Services
Learning and Teaching Development (where appropriate for the development, support and
provision of distance learning)
PLEASE allow the above Departments and Support Services at least 10 days to read your proposal and complete this form.
The
originating department should complete (1), (2) and (3), and request the Head
of each Department or Service consulted to complete the section below (in legible form, preferably typed).
(1)....... SUBJECT OF PROPOSALS:...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(2)....... ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:..........................................................................................................................................................
(3)....... DEPARTMENT CONSULTED ABOUT THE
PROPOSALS:.........................................................................................................
The
Head of the Department consulted should sign below to confirm that adequate
consultation has taken place. (This
will not be taken to imply that agreement has necessarily been reached.)
DEPARTMENT
CONSULTED:
ASPECTS ON WHICH THE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN CONSULTED:
ANY COMMENTS BY THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT CONSULTED:
SIGNATURE OF HEAD OF DEPARTMENT:.....................................................................................................................................................
DATE:...............................................................................................................................................
[June 2003]
Collaborative Proposal
Quality Assurance Statement
This form is
available for downloading from admin/ar/templates - spaces can be expanded as
required.
Name of Department and Departmental
contact. |
Title of Proposal. |
Please provide a clear and
explicit statement of the respective responsibilities of the University and the
partner organisation under each heading, with details of how these
responsibilities will be exercised on an ongoing basis.
1. Student
entry requirements and the handling of admissions. |
2. Student
registration and maintenance of student records. |
3. Determination
and collection of student fees. |
4. The
delivery of learning and teaching. |
5. The
conduct of assessments. |
6. External
Examining procedures, including the appointment of an external
examiner/programme assessor, communications with and functions of the
external examiner/programme assessor and reporting procedure. |
7. The issue of certificates and
transcripts. |
8. Resource
issues including staffing, teaching accommodation, library material and
computing support. |
9. Programme
management. |
10. Quality
assurance and control, including arrangements for student feedback and
programme review, and reviewing the proficiency of staff delivering the
programme. |
11. Student
support and guidance. |
12. Student
concerns, complaints and appeals. |
13. Publicity
and marketing. |
14. Any
other relevant information. |
LOUGHBOROUGH
UNIVERSITY
Regulations
for the Degree Programme in
Information
Science
These Regulations refer to the conduct of the Programme in 2004/2005,
and should be read in conjunction with the General Regulations for
Undergraduate Awards (GRUA) and the relevant Module Specifications. Notice of
change will be given by the Department responsible for the Programme.
1. Structure
1.1 Administrative
responsibility for the programme rests with the Department of Information
Science.
1.2 The programme leads to
the Degree of BA or BSc.
1.3 The duration of the
programme is normally 2 semesters. Students enter directly into Part C under
approved credit transfer arrangements with 120 credits at degree level.
1.4 Candidates must take a
total modular weight of 120 in Part C, with a minimum modular weight of 50
credits in each semester, taking into account both compulsory and optional
modules. Where the modular weight of a
module taught and assessed over both semesters is 20, this shall be split
equally between semesters.
2. Content
2.1 Part C - Degree Modules
Code Title Modular
Weight
Semesters 1 and 2
Compulsory module operating across both
semesters (total weight 30)
ISC059 Dissertation 30
Semester 1
COMPULSORY
MODULES (total weight 20)
ISC017 Legal and Professional Issues 10
ISB016 Information Science 10
OPTIONAL
MODULES (total weight 10-20)
Modules to
give a minimum weight of 50 and a maximum weight of 70 for the Semester from the following:
ISB301 Informatics and Systems 10
ISB304 Information and Knowledge Management
1 10
ISC025 Information and Knowledge Management
in the NHS 10
ISC062 Preservation Management 1 10
ISC311 Gender and Information Studies 10
ISC324 The Book Trade 10
ISC330
Culture and Change Management 10
ISC331 Strategic Planning and Marketing 20
(sems 1 & 2)
Semester
2
COMPULSORY
MODULES (total weight 20)
ISB020 Information Retrieval 10
ISC314 User-Centred Services 10
OPTIONAL
MODULES (total weight 20-40)
Modules
to give a total weight of 120 for the Part from:
ISB022 Publishing Production 10
ISB302 Systems Modelling 10
ISB303 Database Design 10
ISC045 The Child and the Book 10
ISC047 Consumer Health Information 10
ISC063 Preservation Management 2 10
ISC312 The Magazine Business 10
ISC315 Electronic Information Management 10
ISC318 Information and Knowledge Management
2 10
ISC329 Human Information Processing 10
3. Assessment
3.1 Criteria for Progression and Degree Award
To be eligible for the award of the
Honours degree, candidates must achieve 40% in a minimum of 100 credits, and
must obtain at least 30% in all modules.
3.2 Relative Weighting of Parts of the Programme for the purposes
of Final Degree Classification
Candidates final degree
classification will be determined on the basis of their performance in degree
level module assessments in Parts B and C, in accordance with the scheme set
out in GRUA. The average mark for each Part will be combined in the ratio Part
B: 25%, Part C:75% to determine the Programme Mark.
3.3 Re-assessment
Provision will be made in accordance
with GRUA for candidates who have the right of re-assessment in Part C of the Programme
to undergo re-assessment in the Universitys special assessment period, except
where fewer than 40 credits have been achieved.
April
2004