|
Learning and Teaching Committee
Curriculum Sub-Committee
CSC02-M1
<P><hr>
Minutes of the Twenty-Third Meeting of the Sub-Committee held on Thursday 17 January 2002
Membership: Professor S A Austin (Chair), Dr J L Horner, Professor
I C Morison, Dr S P Rice, Mr J Staples and Professor P Warwick (ab)
By Invitation: Dr R I Campbell (for Minute 02/6), Mr J G Dickens,
Dr D R Green, Mr W P J Maunder
In Attendance: Dr J E M Elliott
Apologies for Absence were received from Professor
Warwick
<P><hr>
02/1. Minutes
CSC01-M3
The
minutes of the twenty-second meeting held on 11 October 2001 were confirmed and
signed.
02/2. Matters Arising from the Minutes
CSC02-P1
.1 It was noted that all recommendations to Learning and
Teaching Committee, and subsequently to Senate where appropriate, have been
approved. A relevant minute of Learning and Teaching Committee was noted.
CSC02-P2
.2 Minute 01/44 - MSc Sports Biomechanics/ Sport &
Exercise Psychology/ Physical Activity & Health
The pro-forma for new programme proposals, revised
to reduce duplication of information contained in Programme Specifications was
noted. It was AGREED that this be further revised to include a requirement for
new modules to be listed.
ACTION: JEME
02/3. Module Registration on
Postgraduate Programmes
CSC02-P3
.1 The Sub-Committee considered a Minute of the Programme
Development and Quality Team's meeting on 14 January 2002. At the request of
the Chair of the Sub-Committee, the team had considered the case for allowing
Masters students to register for modules totalling more than 180 credits where necessary
to accommodate option choices from amongst 10, 15 and 20 credit modules. The
team had concluded, with some reluctance, that in practice the possibility of
allowing some students to register for modular options totalling more than 180
credits could not be supported.
.2 Concern was expressed that this decision would restrict
student choice, particularly where students were selecting modules across
departments. There were considered to be four approaches that could be taken in
dealing with the current position:
(a) To accept
the constraint on student choice with the 180 credit limit
(b) To find a mechanism to allow registration above 180 credits
to a 185 credit limit where necessary
(c) To adjust modular credit values in circumstances where a total
of 180 credits could not be achieved
(d) To
revisit the credit currency of postgraduate modules.
Approach (d) was not felt to be feasible in the
short-term,nor necessarily likely to have an outcome that would resolve the
problem should further standardisation of credit values not be considered
desirable, and none of the remaining approaches were considered likely to
provide a totally satisfactory outcome.
.3 There was strong support from the Sub-Committee for allowing
the flexibility of registration on modules up to a credit value of 185. It was
considered that the administrative difficulties in this case were not
insurmountable and were far less significant in human resource terms than a
change in credit currency. Registration and examinations software would require
adjustment but the effect of 185-credit registrations on external data returns
and on load calculations for RASCAL were thought likely to be negligible based
on the handful of students for whom the 180 limit was currently a problem,
though it was acknowledged that such numbers might increase with increased
flexibility on module choice.
.4 It was AGREED to recommend to Learning and Teaching
Committee the following:
- that the Academic Registry be asked to examine in
detail the implications of allowing registration on modules to an upper limit
of 185 credits. It was hoped that changes necessary to registration/
examinations software could be in place by October 2002.
- that in the interim modular credit values be
adjusted where this was essential to prevent the credit total of 180 being
exceeded, bearing in mind any implications for part-time students.
- that in the event that the changes necessary to
permit the flexibility for registration on modules to the 185 credit limit were
impossible, the standard currency of credit values of postgraduate modules
should be revisited. A survey of modular credit value in other institutions
would be valuable.
(Secretary's
note: A recent survey by the Association of University Administrators showed
that of the 49 institutions responding, 37 had a standardised credit rating
system, the majority using 15 credits or multiples thereof as their base
system)
02/4. MSc Social Research (Social Science): Revised New Programme Proposals
CSC02-P4
Further
to Minute 01/46 of the previous meeting, the Sub-Committee considered revised
proposals for September 2002 entry. It was AGREED to recommend the proposals to
Learning and Teaching Committee, subject to the following matter being resolved
to the satisfaction of the AD(T) prior to the meeting of Learning and Teaching
Committee:
(i) The
apparent exclusion of the LPC award from the Programme Regulations
ACTION: WPJM, JEME
02/5. BSc/DIS Quantum Information and Computation
CSC02-P5
.1 The Sub-Committee considered proposals for October 2002
entry. It was noted that exceptionally the proposals had been given outline
approval by Learning and Teaching Committee in advance of detailed
consideration by Curriculum Sub-Committee to allow the programme to be
publicised and allocated a UCAS Code for intake in 2002. The programme was now
being advertised. Interest in it was being expressed and there were already
applicants for 2002 entry.
.2 The Sub-Committee was informed that the increased average
teaching loads resulting from the new programme remained an issue that was the
concern of Operations Sub-Committee, though the effect would be would not be
felt until year 2. The Department was clearly aware of the implications on
teaching load and its enthusiasm for the programme seemed high. Concern was
expressed about the possible input from Research Fellows. It was thought that
the programme was not dependent upon such input but would rather be enhanced by
it.
.3 In considering the consultation forms from other
departments, concern was expressed about the apparent lack of interest shown by
Departments whose areas of interest overlapped. The Sub-Committee expressed
support for action by AD(T)s to encourage rationalisation in programme
development.
.4 It was AGREED to recommend to Learning and Teaching
Committee that the proposals now be forwarded to Senate for approval, subject
to the following matters being resolved by the Department to the satisfaction
of the AD(T) prior to the meeting of Learning and Teaching Committee:
(i) The
position on Library provision be clarified
(ii) The position on the year on an approved course of study at a
European University to be clarified in terms of any credit or award to be given
(without modular credit or a DPS award there would be no entitlement to ERASMUS
funding and students would be deemed to be on Leave of Absence)
(iii) Paragraph 2.5 of the Programme Regulations to be revised to
read '…PHC388 is assumed to be split 20:10 over the two semesters'.
(iv) 'Web-based Materials Study' in PHA291 to be clarified and
assessment to be included in each new module specification, stipulating
examination length.
ACTION: DRG, JEME
02/6. MDes, MA/MSc in Industrial Design with Secondary Subject:
New Programme Proposals
CSC02-P6
.1 The Sub-Committee considered proposals for September 2002
entry. The proposals were discussed in detail with the proposer, Dr Campbell.
.2 It was noted that Master of Design (MDes) would be a new postgraduate award for the University
and would require separate approval by Learning and Teaching Committee and an
amendment to Ordinance IV. The Sub-Committee noted that the University had
adopted titles reflecting the subject focus of Masters degrees only in the case
of extended undergraduate programmes, with the exception of the internationally
accepted MBA. It needed to be considered whether the title MDes should be
introduced for a one-year postgraduate Masters degree when other Loughborough
University titles would suggest this involved a four-year extended
undergraduate programme. Dr Campbell had provided a list of reasons for
adopting the title MDes, which was tabled.
Of the list of institutions which had adopted the
MDes award, this was a postgraduate award for all with the exception of the
four-year MDes at Coventry University. The Sub-Committee was divided as to
whether the new award should be permitted. The case was put that the Industrial
Design community was best placed to appreciate the acceptability of such an
award and that this should not be ruled by local precedent. It was, however, to
be considered a risk that such an award from Loughborough would be conveyed as
a four-year undergraduate degree. This would be a somewhat arbitrary adoption
of a specific postgraduate award title and it needed to be considered how such
a principle would be applied in practice thereafter. The possibility of using
the existing postgraduate award framework, e.g. MSc (Des), was an option for
consideration.
.3 It was AGREED to recommend the proposals to Learning and
Teaching Committee, subject to the following matters being resolved to the
satisfaction of the AD(T) prior to the meeting of Learning and Teaching
Committee, at which the item would be unstarred:
(i) That consideration be given as to whether the 30-credit
Design modules should continue to be available other than as a Summer School
Programme module. Clarification of the 'distance learning' on these modules was
required and confirmation that the advice of Learning and Teaching Development
had been sought in producing these modules.
(ii) Module Specifications required an estimate of contact hours
for the different activities and weightings for each component of assessment.
Internal Examiners should be named and keywords needed some tidying.
Consideration should be given to sequential assessment for the Major Design
Project DTP856, and for DTP857 it should be made clear that the coursework
involved a single project.
(iii) Programme Regulations should split compulsory and optional
modules. Reference to project reports should be included in Module
Specifications rather than Programme Regulations and consideration should be
given to oral presentations for all students whether undertaking a university
or industry-based project, and double-marking by university staff in all cases.
(iv) Paragraph 2.7 of the MA/ MSc Programme Regulations required
revision as the current wording would require registration on modules worth 200
credits which was not permissible under GRMPA. Splitting the 80 credit project
module (e.g. to 20 and 60-credit modules) should be explored.
(v) Suggestion to be provided of possible alternatives to the
proposed MDes award. Further information would be useful on other 'M' degrees
awarded by those institutions already adopting the MDes award.
ACTION: WPJM, JEME
(Secretary's note: Tabled
papers and comments subsequently received from the Careers Service and the
Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering are attached to
these minutes).
02/7. Graduate Apprenticeships: UG and PG Programme Proposals
CSC02-P7, CSC02-P8, CSC02-P9
.1 The Sub-Committee:
(i) Received
a summary of the Graduate Apprenticeship project
(ii) Considered proposals to introduce the Diploma in Professional
Development (DPD) to the following undergraduate programmes, from October 2002:
BA Graphic Communication
BA Ceramics
BA Printed Textiles
BA Illustration
BSc Industrial Design
and Packaging Technology
BSc Information
Management and Computing
BSc Information
Management and Business Studies
BA Publishing with
English
MEng
Systems Engineering
(iii) Considered proposals for a Postgraduate Certificate (LPC) in
Continuing Professional Development, for April 2002 entry.
.2 It was noted that the DPD
would be a new award for the University and would require separate approval by
Learning and Teaching Committee and an amendment to Regulation XI. It was also
noted that the four undergraduate proposals from LUSAD included the
introduction of the DPS award from October 2002. It was suggested that, in due
course, the DIS/ DPS might move towards the more formal structure of the
proposed DPD. Members were informed of Operations Sub-Committee's concern that
the title 'Continuing Professional Development' for the Postgraduate
Certificate was an activity rather than a subject. A recent meeting of the
Graduate Apprenticeship Steering Group had discussed this but considered that
the title should remain, though there may be scope for bracketing the subject
specialisation after the title.
.3 The question was raised as
to whether the DPD was integral to the degree programme and if so should be
reflected in the Intended Learning Outcomes of the programme. It was
acknowledged that in a case such as this where the placement year was an option
there might be a requirement for two sets of Intended Learning Outcomes for the
programme.
.4 It was AGREED to recommend
the proposals to Learning and Teaching Committee, subject to the following
matters being resolved to the satisfaction of the AD(T) of SSH prior to the
meeting of Learning and Teaching Committee:
(i) In the design of postgraduate framework, for the core
business module, that 'x 3 days contact time' be deleted as this was
misleading.
(ii) In the postgraduate Programme Regulations, that paragraph
2.1.3 be renumbered as 2.2 and the department listed as Engineering Management
be changed to Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering.
ACTION: WPJM, JEME
02/8. Postgraduate Training in Joining Technologies
CSC02-P10
The Sub-Committee considered preliminary proposals
from IPTME for a joint programme with the Welding Institute: updated proposals
had been circulated prior to the meeting. The proposals were seen as a parallel
to the MSc in Engineering Management which involved a similar arrangement with
the Joint Board of Engineering Management. It was suggested that the proposer,
Professor Binner, speak with Dr Barry Fisher who was responsible for that
programme. The Sub-Committee, whilst not approving the proposal at this stage,
AGREED to ask the proposer to provide full documentation for consideration at a
future meeting. The Code of Practice for Collaborative Provision would normally
require a Quality Assurance Statement to be provided, but in this case it was
considered that this statement be replaced by a full report explaining how TWI
managed its provision and handled quality and standards, and covering all
points listed in paragraph 10 of the Code. Assurance that EPSRC would be
comfortable with the proposal as a new sixth specialist option on the Masters
Training Package Programme would also be required.
ACTION:
DRG, JEME
02/9. Membership of the Sub-Committee
Further to Minute 01/56 of the previous meeting, the
Sub-Committee reflected on whether its membership should be extended. Whilst
members were not supportive of an extension of the membership, it was felt that
the availability of alternates would be valuable should members be unable to
attend. Meetings would continue to commence at 08.30 a.m. It was AGREED to
recommend to Learning and Teaching Committee that Faculty Board representatives
on the Sub-Committee identify a fellow Board member who could attend a meeting
as their alternate if they themselves were unavailable.
02/10. BSc Geography and Recreation Management/ Leisure Management: Change of Title
CSC02-P11
Further to Minute 01/53 of the previous meeting, and
Senate's subsequent approval of a change in title from Geography and Recreation
Management to Geography and Leisure Management from 2002 entry, it was AGREED
to recommend to Learning and Teaching Committee a further change in title from
2002 entry to Geography and Sport and Leisure Management.
02/11. Undergraduate programmes involving PE
and Sports Science:
Changes of Title
CSC02-P12
It was AGREED to recommend to Learning and Teaching
Committee the following title changes, from October 2003 entry:
PE and Sports Science to Sport and Exercise Sciences
PE, Sports Science and Recreation Management to Sports Science with Management PE,
Sports Science and Physics to Sports Science and Physics
Geography and PE and Sports Science to Geography and Sports Science
PE, Sports Science and Social Science to Sports Science and Social Science
Chemistry and PE and Sports Science to Chemistry and Sports Science
English and PE and Sports Science to English and Sports Science
PE, Sports Science and Mathematics to Sports Science and Mathematics
02/12. MA/LPD/LPC Security Management (Singapore)
CSC02-P13
It was AGREED to ratify the action of the Chair in
approving a second version of Programme Regulations for the Postgraduate
Programme in Security Management, exclusively for students in Singapore.
02/13. Discontinuation of Programmes
CSC02-P14
It was AGREED to recommend to Learning and Teaching
Committee discontinuation of the following programmes (proposed date of last
intake shown in brackets):-
BA Information and
Library Studies (October 1998)
BA Information and Publishing Studies (October 1998)
BA Library and Information Management (October 2000)
BSc Information and Computing (October 1998)
BSc Information and Management (October 1998)
BSc Logistics and Transport Management (October 2001)
BSc Retail Management (Automotive) (October 2001)
MBA Information and Library Management (no recruitment)
MSc Information Studies (October 2001)
MSc Mechanical and Electrical Project Management (October 2001)
02/14. Change of Title - QAU
The change of name of the Quality Assessment Unit to
the Quality Enhancement Unit, in recognition of a change of emphasis in its
role, was noted.
02/15. Date of Next Meeting
Thursday 9 May 2002 am
02/16. BA European Business; Change of Title
CSC02-P15
It was AGREED to recommend to Learning and Teaching
Committee a proposal from the Business School to change the title of the BA
European Business to BA International Business for existing pre-99 cohorts,
with immediate effect.
(From the 1999 cohort the programme had been
entitled International Business)
Author - Jennie
Elliott
Date
- January 2002
Copyright
© Loughborough University. All rights reserved.